openstack team mailing list archive

[Gary Kotton <gkotton@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Fowarding to the list

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal
Date: 	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:47:13 +0200
From: 	Endre Karlson <endre.karlson@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 	gkotton@xxxxxxxxxx



Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just 
adds confusion...

Endre.

2012/7/12 Gary Kotton <gkotton@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:gkotton@xxxxxxxxxx>>

   Hi,
   1. Is this also applicable to the agents? Say for example a user
   wants to ensure that a public network is attached to network
   interface em1 and the private network attached to em2. Is this
   something that will be addressed by the blueprint?
   2. I prefer option #3. This seems to be a cleaner approach for the
   user interface.
   Thanks
   Gary


   On 07/12/2012 01:52 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
>     Hi,
>
>     A proposal for the implementation of the public networks feature
>     has been published.
>     It can be reached from the quantum-v2-public-networks blueprint
>     page [1].
>     Feedback is more than welcome!
>
>     Regards,
>     Salvatore
>
>     [1]:
>     https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-v2-public-networks
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mailing list:https://launchpad.net/~openstack  <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
>     Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Unsubscribe :
>     https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack> More help :
>     https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


   _______________________________________________
   Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
   <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
   Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   <mailto:openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
   <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack>
   More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp