Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Eoghan Glynn <eglynn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah, that could certainly be a direction to head in the longer term. > Sure - I doubt, even if there was somebody willing to start an implementation of this today, that it would land in F! I suppose I'm suggesting that: with the possibility of better solution available, a short-term fix probably shouldn't be implemented, only to then immediately be taken away from operators in the G/H release ;) Thanks, Kiall
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |