openstack team mailing list archive

[Eugene Kirpichov <ekirpichov@xxxxxxxxx>]

+openstack-dev@

To openstack-dev: this is a discussion of an upcoming patch about
native RabbitMQ H/A support in nova. I'll post the patch for
codereview today.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <ekirpichov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yup, that's basically the same thing that Jay suggested :) Obvious in
> retrospect...
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Oleg Gelbukh <ogelbukh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Eugene,
>>
>> I suggest just add option 'rabbit_servers' that will override
>> 'rabbit_host'/'rabbit_port' pair, if present. This won't break anything, in
>> my understanding.
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Oleg Gelbukh
>> Mirantis, Inc.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <ekirpichov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm working on a RabbitMQ H/A patch right now.
>>>
>>> It actually involves more than just using H/A queues (unless you're
>>> willing to add a TCP load balancer on top of your RMQ cluster).
>>> You also need to add support for multiple RabbitMQ's directly to nova.
>>> This is not hard at all, and I have the patch ready and tested in
>>> production.
>>>
>>> Alessandro, if you need this urgently, I can send you the patch right
>>> now before the discussion codereview for inclusion in core nova.
>>>
>>> The only problem is, it breaks backward compatibility a bit: my patch
>>> assumes you have a flag "rabbit_addresses" which should look like
>>> "rmq-host1:5672,rmq-host2:5672" instead of the prior rabbit_host and
>>> rabbit_port flags.
>>>
>>> Guys, can you advise on a way to do this without being ugly and
>>> without breaking compatibility?
>>> Maybe have "rabbit_host", "rabbit_port" be ListOpt's? But that sounds
>>> weird, as their names are in singular.
>>> Maybe have "rabbit_host", "rabbit_port" and also "rabbit_host2",
>>> "rabbit_port2" (assuming we only have clusters of 2 nodes)?
>>> Something else?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > On 07/23/2012 09:02 AM, Alessandro Tagliapietra wrote:
>>> >> Hi guys,
>>> >>
>>> >> just an idea, i'm deploying Openstack trying to make it HA.
>>> >> The missing thing is rabbitmq, which can be easily started in
>>> >> active/active mode, but it needs to declare the queues adding an
>>> >> x-ha-policy entry.
>>> >> http://www.rabbitmq.com/ha.html
>>> >> It would be nice to add a config entry to be able to declare the queues
>>> >> in that way.
>>> >> If someone know where to edit the openstack code, else i'll try to do
>>> >> that in the next weeks maybe.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > https://github.com/openstack/openstack-common/blob/master/openstack/common/rpc/impl_kombu.py
>>> >
>>> > You'll need to add the config options there and the queue is declared
>>> > here with the options supplied to the ConsumerBase constructor:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > https://github.com/openstack/openstack-common/blob/master/openstack/common/rpc/impl_kombu.py#L114
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> > -jay
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> > Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eugene Kirpichov
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekirpichov
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Eugene Kirpichov
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekirpichov



-- 
Eugene Kirpichov
http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekirpichov