openstack team mailing list archive

[Alessandro Tagliapietra <tagliapietra.alessandro@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yup, using as resource is a "old" way as http://www.rabbitmq.com/ha.html
Active/active makes sure that you have no downtime and it's simple as you
don't need to use DRBD.

2012/7/25 Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services) <andrea.rosa@xxxxxx>

> Sorry for my question, I have just seen from the original thread that
> we are talking about HA with Active/Active solution.
> --
> Andrea Rosa
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services)
> >Sent: 25 July 2012 10:45
> >To: Eugene Kirpichov
> >Cc: openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Alessandro Tagliapietra;
> >openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] High Available queues in
> >rabbitmq
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >Your patch doesn't use a Resource manager, so are you working on an
> >Active/Active
> >configuration using mirrored queues? Or are you working on a cluster
> >configuration?
> >
> >I am really interested in that change, thanks for your help.
> >Regards
> >--
> >Andrea Rosa
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: openstack-bounces+andrea.rosa=hp.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>[mailto:openstack-bounces+andrea.rosa=hp.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> >>Behalf Of Alessandro Tagliapietra
> >>Sent: 24 July 2012 17:58
> >>To: Eugene Kirpichov
> >>Cc: openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Subject: Re: [Openstack] High Available queues in rabbitmq
> >>
> >>Oh, so without the need to put an IP floating between hosts.
> >>Good job, thanks for helping
> >>
> >>Best
> >>
> >>Alessandro
> >>
> >>Il giorno 24/lug/2012, alle ore 17:49, Eugene Kirpichov ha scritto:
> >>
> >>> Hi Alessandro,
> >>>
> >>> My patch is about removing the need for pacemaker (and it's pacemaker
> >>> that I denoted with the term "TCP load balancer").
> >>>
> >>> I didn't submit the patch yesterday because I underestimated the
> >>> effort to write unit tests for it and found a few issues on the way.
> >I
> >>> hope I'll finish today.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Alessandro Tagliapietra
> >>> <tagliapietra.alessandro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> Sorry for the delay, i was out from work.
> >>>> Awesome work Eugene, I don't need the patch instantly as i'm still
> >>building the infrastructure.
> >>>> Will it will take alot of time to go in Ubuntu repositories?
> >>>>
> >>>> Why you said you need load balancing? You can use only the master
> >>node and in case the rabbitmq-server dies, switch the ip to the new
> >>master with pacemaker, that's how I would do.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best Regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Alessadro
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Il giorno 23/lug/2012, alle ore 21:49, Eugene Kirpichov ha scritto:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +openstack-dev@
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To openstack-dev: this is a discussion of an upcoming patch about
> >>>>> native RabbitMQ H/A support in nova. I'll post the patch for
> >>>>> codereview today.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Eugene Kirpichov
> >><ekirpichov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>> Yup, that's basically the same thing that Jay suggested :) Obvious
> >>in
> >>>>>> retrospect...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Oleg Gelbukh
> >><ogelbukh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Eugene,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I suggest just add option 'rabbit_servers' that will override
> >>>>>>> 'rabbit_host'/'rabbit_port' pair, if present. This won't break
> >>anything, in
> >>>>>>> my understanding.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>> Oleg Gelbukh
> >>>>>>> Mirantis, Inc.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Eugene Kirpichov
> >><ekirpichov@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'm working on a RabbitMQ H/A patch right now.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It actually involves more than just using H/A queues (unless
> >>you're
> >>>>>>>> willing to add a TCP load balancer on top of your RMQ cluster).
> >>>>>>>> You also need to add support for multiple RabbitMQ's directly to
> >>nova.
> >>>>>>>> This is not hard at all, and I have the patch ready and tested
> >in
> >>>>>>>> production.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Alessandro, if you need this urgently, I can send you the patch
> >>right
> >>>>>>>> now before the discussion codereview for inclusion in core nova.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The only problem is, it breaks backward compatibility a bit: my
> >>patch
> >>>>>>>> assumes you have a flag "rabbit_addresses" which should look
> >like
> >>>>>>>> "rmq-host1:5672,rmq-host2:5672" instead of the prior rabbit_host
> >>and
> >>>>>>>> rabbit_port flags.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Guys, can you advise on a way to do this without being ugly and
> >>>>>>>> without breaking compatibility?
> >>>>>>>> Maybe have "rabbit_host", "rabbit_port" be ListOpt's? But that
> >>sounds
> >>>>>>>> weird, as their names are in singular.
> >>>>>>>> Maybe have "rabbit_host", "rabbit_port" and also "rabbit_host2",
> >>>>>>>> "rabbit_port2" (assuming we only have clusters of 2 nodes)?
> >>>>>>>> Something else?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 07/23/2012 09:02 AM, Alessandro Tagliapietra wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> just an idea, i'm deploying Openstack trying to make it HA.
> >>>>>>>>>> The missing thing is rabbitmq, which can be easily started in
> >>>>>>>>>> active/active mode, but it needs to declare the queues adding
> >>an
> >>>>>>>>>> x-ha-policy entry.
> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.rabbitmq.com/ha.html
> >>>>>>>>>> It would be nice to add a config entry to be able to declare
> >>the queues
> >>>>>>>>>> in that way.
> >>>>>>>>>> If someone know where to edit the openstack code, else i'll
> >try
> >>to do
> >>>>>>>>>> that in the next weeks maybe.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/openstack/openstack-
> >>common/blob/master/openstack/common/rpc/impl_kombu.py
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> You'll need to add the config options there and the queue is
> >>declared
> >>>>>>>>> here with the options supplied to the ConsumerBase constructor:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/openstack/openstack-
> >>common/blob/master/openstack/common/rpc/impl_kombu.py#L114
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>> -jay
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>>>>>>>> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>>>>>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Eugene Kirpichov
> >>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekirpichov
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>>>>>>> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>>>>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Eugene Kirpichov
> >>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekirpichov
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Eugene Kirpichov
> >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekirpichov
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>>>> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Eugene Kirpichov
> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/eugenekirpichov
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>