openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #15632
Re: KVM live block migration: stability, future, docs
Daniel,
Thanks for providing this insight, most useful. I'm interpreting this
as: block migration can be used in non-critical applications, mileage
will vary, thorough testing in the particular environment is
recommended. An alternative implementation will come, but the higher
level feature (live-migration without shared storage) is unlikely to
disappear.
Is that a reasonable appraisal?
On 8 August 2012 19:59, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Block migration is a part of the KVM that none of the upstream developers
> really like, is not entirely reliable, and most distros typically do not
> want to support it due to its poor design (eg not supported in RHEL).
Would you mind/be-able-to elaborate on those reliability issues? E.g.,
is there anything we can do to mitigate them?
--
Cheers,
~Blairo
References
-
KVM live block migration: stability, future, docs
From: Blair Bethwaite, 2012-08-06
-
Re: KVM live block migration: stability, future, docs
From: Sébastien Han, 2012-08-07
-
Re: KVM live block migration: stability, future, docs
From: Blair Bethwaite, 2012-08-07
-
Re: KVM live block migration: stability, future, docs
From: Jay Pipes, 2012-08-07
-
Re: KVM live block migration: stability, future, docs
From: Daniel P. Berrange, 2012-08-08