openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #15827
Re: [Nova] How common is user_data for instances?
On 08/13/2012 07:38 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> On 14/08/12 08:54, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
>> I was *going* to create a random-data table with the same average row
>> size as the instances table in Nova to see how long the migration would
>> take, and then I realized something... The user_data column is already
>> of column type MEDIUMTEXT, not TEXT:
>>
>> jpipes@uberbox:~$ mysql -uroot nova -e "DESC instances" | grep user_data
>> user_data mediumtext YES NULL
>>
>> So the column can already store data up to 2^24 bytes long, or 16MB of
>> data. So this might be a moot issue already? Do we expect user data to
>> be more than 16MB?
>
> The bug reports truncation at 64kb. The last schema change I can see for
> that column is Essex version 82, which has:
>
> $ grep user_data *.py
> 082_essex.py: Column('user_data', Text),
>
> http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/dialects/mysql.html says that Text
> is "MySQL TEXT type, for text up to 2^16 characters".
>
> Am I misunderstanding something here?
No, I read the exact same thing in the SQLAlchemy docs and was surprised
to see the column type was MEDIUMTEXT. But I assure you it is :) Just
run devstack and verify!
-jay
References