On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Thierry Carrez<thierry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dan Wendlandt wrote:
I must admit even I was unaware of the requirement to be a individual
foundation member in order to vote in PTL elections (I personally
happen to be a member already). There are definitely at least a few
people on the list below that I feel should be able to vote but can't,
including two core members, Sumit and Aaron.
It's a requirement that was set upon us by the Foundation bylaws, and
that was communicated on the wiki page describing the election process
(and in one of my subsequent nagging emails). I agree it could have been
communicated a bit more clearly, but hey, I was in vacation :)
and a well deserved vacation at that :)
This is not the end of the world, but I'm guessing both Gary and I
would both feel better if people had a chance to revisit their
foundation status. Is there anything we can do about this?
The wording in the rules on the wiki is slightly ambiguous as it
mentions a clear cut-off dates for commits, but no cut-off date for
Foundation individual membership.
My suggestion would therefore be to give Quantum committers until the
end of the day to sign up for the Foundation as an individual member if
they want to participate in the election.
We would enable that interpretation of the election rules if both
candidates agree, and the other election officials agree.
Would that work for you ?
That would be fantastic. To a large degree, I feel bad that I was
unaware of this rule and therefore didn't alert the rest of the
Quantum team members at the team meeting to make sure they were aware
of the voting requirement.
I spoke with Gary on IRC and I believe he would agree with this. He
was away from computer for a bit, but I asked him to chime in on the
thread when he was back online.
