openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #16693
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
It may be worth trying to write a short sentence describing the purpose of
each list. The kind of sentence new users will see when deciding which
lists to subscribe to.
Personally - I think it's going to be difficult to come up with a clear
distinction between the general and operators lists, and if there is no
clear distinction, I see no value in separate lists.. B2 (or B1) would be
my preference.
Thanks,
Kiall
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Russell Bryant wrote:
> > On 09/12/2012 08:56 PM, Syd (Sydney) Logan wrote:
> >> Guess the only advantage would be to minimize the chance of someone
> >> missing the security related messages in the noise of a heavy traffic
> >> mailing list.
> >>
> >> Even if there were a specialized list, I’d think you’d want to cross
> >> post security issues to all lists, depending on severity (and with
> >> security, all issues are generally severe).
> >
> > We have started posting the security advisories to the
> > openstack-announce list, as well. That should cover those wanting to
> > watch out for them on a low volume mailing list.
> >
> > I like the simple group of openstack@, openstack-dev@, and
> > openstack-announce@.
>
> That would be option B2 ("single user/general list, named openstack"):
> openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I think it's the clearest to avoid cross-posting...
>
> Reminder: here were the other options:
>
> Option A1 ("separate operators, general named openstack-general"):
> openstack-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-operators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Option A2 ("separate operators, general just named openstack)":
> openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-operators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Option B1 ("single user/general list, named openstack-user"):
> openstack-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Option Z ("keep current situation"):
> openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-operators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> openstack-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> My own order of preference is A1, B2, A2, B1, Z. I'm fine with B2 if
> people in -operators are OK with it.
>
> --
> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
> Release Manager, OpenStack
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References
-
Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Stefano Maffulli, 2012-08-27
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Brian Schott, 2012-08-27
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Andrew Clay Shafer, 2012-08-28
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Francis J. Lacoste, 2012-08-28
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Stefano Maffulli, 2012-08-28
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-09-04
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Kevin Jackson, 2012-09-12
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Asher Newcomer, 2012-09-13
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Syd (Sydney) Logan, 2012-09-13
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Russell Bryant, 2012-09-13
-
Re: Future of Launchpad OpenStack mailing list (this list)
From: Thierry Carrez, 2012-09-13