openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #17824
Re: Tracking triage statistics
On 10/26/2012 12:41 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 09:30 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>> I thought about this... Surely any triage is better than none? If we
>> don't reward self triage, then someone else will still have to triage
>> the bug, right?
>>
>> I'd be interested in other people's thoughts on this.
>
> I guess I figured it's just expected that you triage your own bugs that
> you filed for patches you're submitting. You're getting credit for that
> in other places (a merged patch, a fixed bug). If you're lazy and make
> someone else do it, we should certainly give them triage credit for it.
>
> But I see your point. It's still real work that was done. I'm fine
> with leaving it how you have it.
Ok, I've tweaked this a little.
Report (a * after the bug id indicates self triage):
Chuck Short: 6 (1065211, 1065848, 1066213, 1066254, 1066845, 1068539)
Dan Prince: 1 (1070509*)
Michael Still: 6 (1062474, 1070349, 1064854, 1065728*, 1065430, 1070452)
Mauro Sergio Martins Rodrigues: 16 (1070155*, 1070156*, 1070157*,
1070158*, 1070160*, 1070161*, 1070162*, 1070163*, 1070164*, 1070165*,
1070167*, 1070169*, 1070170*, 1070171*, 1070172*, 1070173*)
Matthew Treinish: 1 (1071338*)
Russell Bryant: 1 (1067858*)
Vish Ishaya: 9 (1071017, 1071547, 1053814, 1066887, 1067638, 1067744,
1068154, 1071069, 1071462)
So, you get the cookie, but people know about it too.
Mikal
Follow ups
References