openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #17945
Re: Quotas in folsom
+1 for Boson ... this is a key area for CERN too. When you have a fixed budget and no credit cards, quota management is a strong requirement!
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Kevin L. Mitchell
> Sent: 29 October 2012 20:26
> To: openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Quotas in folsom
>
> On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 18:01 +0000, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> > It's also worth noting that we are now in territory where quotas are
> > controlled by multiple projects: volumes and gigabytes have quotas in
> > both Nova and Cinder; network quotas are in both Nova and Quantum...
> >
> > While I don't think it makes sense to try and centralize these things,
> > I think the projects could coordinate more to understand "who" should
> > be managing a given quota and to try and make the end-user experience
> > less baffling.
>
> It's also worth noting that I've finally been able to start working on Boson,
> which may help with that…
> --
> Kevin L. Mitchell <kevin.mitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
References