openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #18320
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
There is a use case for base metal hardware metering in the private cloud
where the user allocated the machine does not have root access to kill the
metering.
Being able to create a single metering infrastructure for the entire private
cloud, virtual or bare-metal allocation, is a need.... technically, it is
not clear how to guarantee it but it is worth exploring.
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of Robert Collins
> Sent: 06 November 2012 11:00
> To: Graf Lucas (graflu0); Zehnder Toni (zehndton);
> openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Doug Hellmann
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Julien Danjou <julien@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06 2012, Graf Lucas (graflu0) wrote:
> >
> >> I'm a little confused now... ;) Is the bare metal run by the platform
> >> operator the physical machine? What do you mean with the bare metal
> >> run to replace virtual instances for any project?
> >
> > AFAIU, bare-metal provisionning is about using hardware (bare-metal)
> > rather than virtual instances as a flavor in Nova.
> > For such case, we won't be able to poll anything about the hardware.
> >
> > For hardware ran by the operator, this will be doable.
>
> We can still talk to the IPMI controller for the machine, which will get
us lots
> of info, without running agents in the host os.
>
> -Rob
>
>
>
> --
> Robert Collins <rbtcollins@xxxxxx>
> Distinguished Technologist
> HP Cloud Services
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Follow ups
References
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Zehnder Toni (zehndton), 2012-11-01
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Julien Danjou, 2012-11-01
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Zehnder Toni (zehndton), 2012-11-05
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Doug Hellmann, 2012-11-05
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Julien Danjou, 2012-11-05
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Doug Hellmann, 2012-11-05
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Julien Danjou, 2012-11-05
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Graf Lucas (graflu0), 2012-11-06
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Julien Danjou, 2012-11-06
-
Re: [ceilometer] Monitoring physical devices
From: Robert Collins, 2012-11-06