openstack team mailing list archive

[Yi Sun <beyounn@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, I was talking about quantum. And in that case ,I will close the bug I filed
Thx
Yi

On Nov 10, 2012, at 4:25 AM, Dan Wendlandt <dan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> It would be important to understand if you are using Quantum or traditional nova networking (e.g., Flat/Vlan Managers).  
> 
> Vish's patch is targeted only for traditional nova-networking, but based on this post by you (https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1077304) it seems like you may be using Quantum.  
> 
> Nic ordering worked with Quantum in Essex, but a bug was introduced in Folsom that broke it.  This bug was recently fixed and merged during early grizzly (thanks to mark mcclain from dreamhost), see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1064524 .  
> 
> This bug is tagged with folsom-backport-potential, so the team in charge of stable releases for nova should be pulling it into an upcoming folsom release. 
> 
> Dan 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya <vishvananda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Pardon me, the bottom line should have said, propose it into trunk and backport it (into folsom/stable). So the answer to your question is yes.
>> 
>> Vish
>> 
>> On Nov 9, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Yi Sun <beyounn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> > Thanks, will these changes ever be added back to the later releases?
>> > Yi
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Dan Wendlandt 
> Nicira, Inc: www.nicira.com
> twitter: danwendlandt
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>