openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #21104
Re: [Swift]A design draft of Storage Quota
We also feel an integrated approach such as Boson is the way forward for quota rather than each project have its own (and potentially differing) implementations on areas such as delegation.
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:openstack-bounces+tim.bell=cern.ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Kevin L. Mitchell
> Sent: 20 February 2013 17:26
> To: openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Swift]A design draft of Storage Quota
>
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 18:11 +0800, Alex Yang wrote:
> > Storage Quotas Design
> > This is the design draft of Storage Quota.
> > Implementation of this design is
> > https://github.com/AlexYangYu/StackLab-swift/tree/dev-quota
>
> I'll also point out Boson: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Boson and
> https://github.com/klmitch/boson with some initial work. Unfortunately, I'm
> not able to work on Boson at the moment due to higher-priority tasks…
> --
> Kevin L. Mitchell <kevin.mitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Follow ups
References