openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #22981
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
Could it be zeroconf? I think avahi-daemon in some cases adds that route;
perhaps it's worth trying and stopping it.
Salvatore
On 25 April 2013 08:15, Balamurugan V G <balamuruganvg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Leen,
>
> I do not have any other DHCP sever which can do this other than the one
> created by quantum. Infact, If i delete the route manually and restart the
> network(interface down and up), I get the routed added back. Please refer
> below:
>
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# route -n
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1000 0 0
> eth0
> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1 0 0
> eth0
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# route del -net 169.254.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# route -n
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
>
> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1 0 0
> eth0
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# ls
> dhclient-7d27ffd3-3b9c-4d92-b81d-7ef16c1a965c-eth0.lease dhclient.leases
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# rm *
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# ifconfig eth0 down
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# ifconfig eth0 up
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# route -n
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
> 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1000 0 0
> eth0
> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1 0 0
> eth0
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# ls
> dhclient-7d27ffd3-3b9c-4d92-b81d-7ef16c1a965c-eth0.lease
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp# cat
> dhclient-7d27ffd3-3b9c-4d92-b81d-7ef16c1a965c-eth0.lease
> lease {
> interface "eth0";
> fixed-address 192.168.2.4;
> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
> option routers 192.168.2.1;
> option dhcp-lease-time 120;
> option dhcp-message-type 5;
> option domain-name-servers 10.5.3.52;
> option dhcp-server-identifier 192.168.2.2;
> option dhcp-renewal-time 60;
> option broadcast-address 192.168.2.255;
> option dhcp-rebinding-time 105;
> option host-name "192-168-2-4";
> option domain-name "openstacklocal";
> renew 4 2013/04/25 07:06:57;
> rebind 4 2013/04/25 07:07:47;
> expire 4 2013/04/25 07:08:02;
> }
> root@vm:/var/lib/dhcp#
>
> root@vm:~#
>
> Regards,
> Balu
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Leen Besselink <ubuntu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > wrote:
>
>> Balu ?
>>
>> Have you tried looking in the /var/lib/dhcp directory (the directory
>> might depend
>> on the DHCP-client you are using) of the Ubuntu image ?
>>
>> As this isn't a clean image but it has been connected to an other
>> network, maybe a
>> previous DHCP-server told it to add the route ? And now the client is
>> just re-using
>> an old lease ?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:13:52PM -0700, Aaron Rosen wrote:
>> > I'm not sure but if it works fine with the ubuntu cloud image and not
>> with
>> > your ubuntu image than there is something in your image adding that
>> route.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Balamurugan V G
>> > <balamuruganvg@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Aaron,
>> > >
>> > > I tried the image you pointed and it worked fine out of the box. That
>> is
>> > > it did not get the route to 169.254.0.0.26 on boot and I am able to
>> > > retrieve info from metadata service. The image I was using earlier is
>> a
>> > > Ubuntu 12.04 LTS desktop image. What do you think could be wrong with
>> my
>> > > image? Its almost the vanilla Ubuntu image, I have not installed
>> much. on
>> > > it.
>> > >
>> > > Here is the quantum details you asked and more. This was taken before
>> I
>> > > tried the image you pointed to. And by the way, I have not added any
>> host
>> > > route as well.
>> > >
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# quantum router-list
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+---------+--------------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | id | name |
>> external_gateway_info
>> > > |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+---------+--------------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | d9e87e85-8410-4398-9ddd-2dbc36f4b593 | router1 | {"network_id":
>> > > "e8862e1c-0233-481f-b284-b027039feef7"} |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+---------+--------------------------------------------------------+
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# quantum net-list
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+---------+-----------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | id | name | subnets
>> > > |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+---------+-----------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | c4a7475e-e33f-47d0-a6ff-d0cf50c012d7 | net1 |
>> > > ecdfe002-658e-4174-a33c-934ba09179b7 192.168.2.0/24 |
>> > > | e8862e1c-0233-481f-b284-b027039feef7 | ext_net |
>> > > 783e6a47-d7e0-46ba-9c2a-55a92406b23b 10.5.12.20/24 |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+---------+-----------------------------------------------------+
>> > > *root@openstack-dev:~# quantum subnet-list
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------+----------------+--------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | id | name | cidr |
>> > > allocation_pools |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------+----------------+--------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | 783e6a47-d7e0-46ba-9c2a-55a92406b23b | | 10.5.12.20/24 |
>> > > {"start": "10.5.12.21", "end": "10.5.12.25"} |
>> > > | ecdfe002-658e-4174-a33c-934ba09179b7 | | 192.168.2.0/24 |
>> > > {"start": "192.168.2.2", "end": "192.168.2.254"} |*
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------+----------------+--------------------------------------------------+
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# quantum port-list
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------+-------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | id | name | mac_address |
>> > > fixed_ips
>> > > |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------+-------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | 193bb8ee-f50d-4b1f-87ae-e033c1730953 | | fa:16:3e:91:3d:c0 |
>> > > {"subnet_id": "783e6a47-d7e0-46ba-9c2a-55a92406b23b", "ip_address":
>> > > "10.5.12.21"} |
>> > > | 19bce882-c746-497b-b401-dedf5ab605b2 | | fa:16:3e:97:89:f6 |
>> > > {"subnet_id": "783e6a47-d7e0-46ba-9c2a-55a92406b23b", "ip_address":
>> > > "10.5.12.23"} |
>> > > | 41ab9b15-ddc9-4a00-9a34-2e3f14e7e92f | | fa:16:3e:45:58:03 |
>> > > {"subnet_id": "ecdfe002-658e-4174-a33c-934ba09179b7", "ip_address":
>> > > "192.168.2.2"} |
>> > > | 4dbc3c55-5763-4cfa-a7c1-81b254693e87 | | fa:16:3e:83:a7:e4 |
>> > > {"subnet_id": "ecdfe002-658e-4174-a33c-934ba09179b7", "ip_address":
>> > > "192.168.2.3"} |
>> > > | 59e69986-6e8a-4f1e-a754-a1d421cdebde | | fa:16:3e:91:ee:76 |
>> > > {"subnet_id": "ecdfe002-658e-4174-a33c-934ba09179b7", "ip_address":
>> > > "192.168.2.1"} |
>> > > | 65167653-f6ff-438b-b465-f5dcc8974549 | | fa:16:3e:a7:77:0b |
>> > > {"subnet_id": "783e6a47-d7e0-46ba-9c2a-55a92406b23b", "ip_address":
>> > > "10.5.12.24"} |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------+-------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# quantum floatingip-list
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------------------+---------------------+--------------------------------------+
>> > > | id | fixed_ip_address |
>> > > floating_ip_address | port_id |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------------------+---------------------+--------------------------------------+
>> > > | 1a5dfbf3-0986-461d-854e-f4f8ebb58f8d | 192.168.2.3 | 10.5.12.23
>> > > | 4dbc3c55-5763-4cfa-a7c1-81b254693e87 |
>> > > | f9d6e7f4-b251-4a2d-9310-532d8ee376f6 | | 10.5.12.24
>> > > | |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------------------+---------------------+--------------------------------------+
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# quantum subnet-show
>> > > ecdfe002-658e-4174-a33c-934ba09179b7
>> > >
>> +------------------+--------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | Field | Value
>> |
>> > >
>> +------------------+--------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | allocation_pools | {"start": "192.168.2.2", "end": "192.168.2.254"}
>> |
>> > > | cidr | 192.168.2.0/24
>> |
>> > > | dns_nameservers | 10.5.3.52
>> |
>> > > | enable_dhcp | True
>> |
>> > > | gateway_ip | 192.168.2.1
>> |
>> > > | host_routes |
>> |
>> > > | id | ecdfe002-658e-4174-a33c-934ba09179b7
>> |
>> > > | ip_version | 4
>> |
>> > > | name |
>> |
>> > > | network_id | c4a7475e-e33f-47d0-a6ff-d0cf50c012d7
>> |
>> > > | tenant_id | 7a416e3eaa814734bda41ffca7c2d01e
>> |
>> > >
>> +------------------+--------------------------------------------------+
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# nova list
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------+--------+------------------------------+
>> > > | ID | Name | Status | Networks
>> > > |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------+--------+------------------------------+
>> > > | 99d57290-0d41-4478-8fb1-c9f9710a4b5b | VM1 | ACTIVE |
>> net1=192.168.2.3,
>> > > 10.5.12.23 |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +--------------------------------------+------+--------+------------------------------+
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# nova show 99d57290-0d41-4478-8fb1-c9f9710a4b5b
>> > >
>> > >
>> +-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | Property | Value
>> > > |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>> > > | status | ACTIVE
>> > > |
>> > > | updated | 2013-04-25T04:22:39Z
>> > > |
>> > > | OS-EXT-STS:task_state | None
>> > > |
>> > > | OS-EXT-SRV-ATTR:host | openstack-dev
>> > > |
>> > > | key_name | None
>> > > |
>> > > | image | UbuntuDesktop1204_x86
>> > > (943e86c3-5c92-48b7-8961-05f22bfb17d4) |
>> > > | hostId |
>> > > 6f4dd2cb679237445ddd8012fa1b0068fa9cb4881546fc5b15a6d296 |
>> > > | OS-EXT-STS:vm_state | active
>> > > |
>> > > | OS-EXT-SRV-ATTR:instance_name | instance-00000021
>> > > |
>> > > | OS-EXT-SRV-ATTR:hypervisor_hostname |
>> > > openstack-dev.blr.eng.sonicwall.com |
>> > > | flavor | m1.tiny
>> > > (1a2101c2-f20b-426d-b794-94d6a9418dfc) |
>> > > | id |
>> > > 99d57290-0d41-4478-8fb1-c9f9710a4b5b |
>> > > | security_groups | [{u'name': u'default'}]
>> > > |
>> > > | user_id |
>> 117e0142ab40418eafc56955f0ab2ba3
>> > > |
>> > > | name | VM1
>> > > |
>> > > | created | 2013-04-25T04:22:28Z
>> > > |
>> > > | tenant_id |
>> 7a416e3eaa814734bda41ffca7c2d01e
>> > > |
>> > > | OS-DCF:diskConfig | MANUAL
>> > > |
>> > > | metadata | {}
>> > > |
>> > > | accessIPv4 |
>> > > |
>> > > | accessIPv6 |
>> > > |
>> > > | net1 network | 192.168.2.3, 10.5.12.23
>> > > |
>> > > | progress | 0
>> > > |
>> > > | OS-EXT-STS:power_state | 1
>> > > |
>> > > | OS-EXT-AZ:availability_zone | nova
>> > > |
>> > > | config_drive |
>> > > |
>> > >
>> > >
>> +-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# ip netns
>> > > qdhcp-c4a7475e-e33f-47d0-a6ff-d0cf50c012d7
>> > > qrouter-d9e87e85-8410-4398-9ddd-2dbc36f4b593
>> > >
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# ip netns exec
>> > > qrouter-d9e87e85-8410-4398-9ddd-2dbc36f4b593 route -n
>> > > Kernel IP routing table
>> > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref
>> Use
>> > > Iface
>> > > 0.0.0.0 10.5.12.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0
>> 0
>> > > qg-193bb8ee-f5
>> > > 10.5.12.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
>> 0
>> > > qg-193bb8ee-f5
>> > > 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
>> 0
>> > > qr-59e69986-6e
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~# ip netns exec
>> > > qrouter-d9e87e85-8410-4398-9ddd-2dbc36f4b593 ifconfig
>> > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>> > > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
>> > > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>> > > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
>> > > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> > > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> > > RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>> > >
>> > > qg-193bb8ee-f5 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr fa:16:3e:91:3d:c0
>> > > inet addr:10.5.12.21 Bcast:10.5.12.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> > > inet6 addr: fe80::f816:3eff:fe91:3dc0/64 Scope:Link
>> > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> > > RX packets:121097 errors:0 dropped:104 overruns:0 frame:0
>> > > TX packets:38777 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> > > RX bytes:88797723 (88.7 MB) TX bytes:3112197 (3.1 MB)
>> > >
>> > > qr-59e69986-6e Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr fa:16:3e:91:ee:76
>> > > inet addr:192.168.2.1 Bcast:192.168.2.255
>> Mask:255.255.255.0
>> > > inet6 addr: fe80::f816:3eff:fe91:ee76/64 Scope:Link
>> > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> > > RX packets:101615 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> > > TX packets:68028 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>> > > RX bytes:12476279 (12.4 MB) TX bytes:83025755 (83.0 MB)
>> > >
>> > > root@openstack-dev:~#
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Balu
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Aaron Rosen <arosen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Can you show us a quantum subnet-show for the subnet your vm has an
>> ip
>> > >> on. Is it possible that you added a host_route to the subnet for
>> > >> 169.254/16?
>> > >>
>> > >> Or could you try this image:
>> > >>
>> http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/precise/current/precise-server-cloudimg-amd64-disk1.img
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Balamurugan V G <
>> balamuruganvg@xxxxxxxxx
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> I booted a Ubuntu Image in which I had made sure that there was no
>> > >>> pre-existing route for 169,254.0.0/16. But its getting the route
>> from DHCP
>> > >>> once its boots up. So its the DHCP server which is sending this
>> route to
>> > >>> the VM.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Regards,
>> > >>> Balu
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Balamurugan V G <
>> > >>> balamuruganvg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Hi Salvatore,
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Thanks for the response. I do not have
>> enable_isolated_metadata_proxy
>> > >>>> anywhere under /etc/quantum and /etc/nova. The closest I see is
>> > >>>> 'enable_isolated_metadata' in /etc/quantum/dhcp_agent.ini and even
>> that is
>> > >>>> commented out. What do you mean by link-local address?
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Like you said, I suspect that the image has the route. This was
>> was a
>> > >>>> snapshot taken in a Folsom setup. So its possible that Folsom has
>> injected
>> > >>>> this route and when I took the snapshot, it became part of the
>> snapshot. I
>> > >>>> then copied over this snapshot to a new Grizzly setup. Let me
>> check the
>> > >>>> image and remove it from the image if it has the route. Thanks for
>> the hint
>> > >>>> again.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Regards,
>> > >>>> Balu
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Salvatore Orlando <
>> > >>>> sorlando@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> The dhcp agent will set a route to 169.254.0.0/16 if
>> > >>>>> enable_isolated_metadata_proxy=True.
>> > >>>>> In that case the dhcp port ip will be the nexthop for that route.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Otherwise, it might be your image might have a 'builtin' route to
>> such
>> > >>>>> cidr.
>> > >>>>> What's your nexthop for the link-local address?
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Salvatore
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On 24 April 2013 08:00, Balamurugan V G <balamuruganvg@xxxxxxxxx
>> >wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Thanks for the hint Aaron. When I deleted the route for
>> > >>>>>> 169.254.0.0/16 from the VMs routing table, I could access the
>> > >>>>>> metadata service!
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> The route for 169.254.0.0/16 is added automatically when the
>> > >>>>>> instance boots up, so I assume its coming from the DHCP. Any
>> idea how this
>> > >>>>>> can be suppressed?
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Strangely though, I do not see this route in a WindowsXP VM
>> booted in
>> > >>>>>> the same network as the earlier Ubuntu VM and the Windows VM can
>> reach the
>> > >>>>>> metadata service with out me doing anything. The issue is with
>> the Ubuntu
>> > >>>>>> VM.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >>>>>> Balu
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Aaron Rosen <arosen@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> The vm should not have a routing table entry for 169.254.0.0/16 if
>> > >>>>>>> it does i'm not sure how it got there unless it was added by
>> something
>> > >>>>>>> other than dhcp. It seems like that is your problem as the vm
>> is arping
>> > >>>>>>> directly for that address rather than the default gw.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Balamurugan V G <
>> > >>>>>>> balamuruganvg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks Aaron.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> I am perhaps not configuring it right then. I am using Ubuntu
>> 12.04
>> > >>>>>>>> host and even my guest(VM) is Ubuntu 12.04 but metadata not
>> working. I see
>> > >>>>>>>> that the VM's routing table has an entry for 169.254.0.0/16but I
>> > >>>>>>>> cant ping 169.254.169.254 from the VM. I am using a single
>> node setup with
>> > >>>>>>>> two NICs.10.5.12.20 is the public IP, 10.5.3.230 is the
>> management IP
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> These are my metadata related configurations.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> */etc/nova/nova.conf *
>> > >>>>>>>> metadata_host = 10.5.12.20
>> > >>>>>>>> metadata_listen = 127.0.0.1
>> > >>>>>>>> metadata_listen_port = 8775
>> > >>>>>>>> metadata_manager=nova.api.manager.MetadataManager
>> > >>>>>>>> service_quantum_metadata_proxy = true
>> > >>>>>>>> quantum_metadata_proxy_shared_secret = metasecret123
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> */etc/quantum/quantum.conf*
>> > >>>>>>>> allow_overlapping_ips = True
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> */etc/quantum/l3_agent.ini*
>> > >>>>>>>> use_namespaces = True
>> > >>>>>>>> auth_url = http://10.5.3.230:35357/v2.0
>> > >>>>>>>> auth_region = RegionOne
>> > >>>>>>>> admin_tenant_name = service
>> > >>>>>>>> admin_user = quantum
>> > >>>>>>>> admin_password = service_pass
>> > >>>>>>>> metadata_ip = 10.5.12.20
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> */etc/quantum/metadata_agent.ini*
>> > >>>>>>>> auth_url = http://10.5.3.230:35357/v2.0
>> > >>>>>>>> auth_region = RegionOne
>> > >>>>>>>> admin_tenant_name = service
>> > >>>>>>>> admin_user = quantum
>> > >>>>>>>> admin_password = service_pass
>> > >>>>>>>> nova_metadata_ip = 127.0.0.1
>> > >>>>>>>> nova_metadata_port = 8775
>> > >>>>>>>> metadata_proxy_shared_secret = metasecret123
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> I see that /usr/bin/quantum-ns-metadata-proxy process is
>> running.
>> > >>>>>>>> When I ping 169.254.169.254 from VM, in the host's router
>> namespace, I see
>> > >>>>>>>> the ARP request but no response.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> root@openstack-dev:~# ip netns exec
>> > >>>>>>>> qrouter-d9e87e85-8410-4398-9ddd-2dbc36f4b593 route -n
>> > >>>>>>>> Kernel IP routing table
>> > >>>>>>>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric
>> Ref
>> > >>>>>>>> Use Iface
>> > >>>>>>>> 0.0.0.0 10.5.12.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0
>> > >>>>>>>> 0 0 qg-193bb8ee-f5
>> > >>>>>>>> 10.5.12.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0
>> > >>>>>>>> 0 0 qg-193bb8ee-f5
>> > >>>>>>>> 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0
>> > >>>>>>>> 0 0 qr-59e69986-6e
>> > >>>>>>>> root@openstack-dev:~# ip netns exec
>> > >>>>>>>> qrouter-d9e87e85-8410-4398-9ddd-2dbc36f4b593 tcpdump -i
>> qr-59e69986-6e
>> > >>>>>>>> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full
>> protocol
>> > >>>>>>>> decode
>> > >>>>>>>> listening on qr-59e69986-6e, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet),
>> capture
>> > >>>>>>>> size 65535 bytes
>> > >>>>>>>> ^C23:32:09.638289 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.2.3 tell
>> > >>>>>>>> 192.168.2.1, length 28
>> > >>>>>>>> 23:32:09.650043 ARP, Reply 192.168.2.3 is-at fa:16:3e:4f:ad:df
>> (oui
>> > >>>>>>>> Unknown), length 28
>> > >>>>>>>> 23:32:15.768942 ARP, Request who-has 169.254.169.254 tell
>> > >>>>>>>> 192.168.2.3, length 28
>> > >>>>>>>> 23:32:16.766896 ARP, Request who-has 169.254.169.254 tell
>> > >>>>>>>> 192.168.2.3, length 28
>> > >>>>>>>> 23:32:17.766712 ARP, Request who-has 169.254.169.254 tell
>> > >>>>>>>> 192.168.2.3, length 28
>> > >>>>>>>> 23:32:18.784195 ARP, Request who-has 169.254.169.254 tell
>> > >>>>>>>> 192.168.2.3, length 28
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> 6 packets captured
>> > >>>>>>>> 6 packets received by filter
>> > >>>>>>>> 0 packets dropped by kernel
>> > >>>>>>>> root@openstack-dev:~#
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Any help will be greatly appreciated.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >>>>>>>> Balu
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Aaron Rosen <
>> arosen@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Yup, If your host supports namespaces this can be done via the
>> > >>>>>>>>> quantum-metadata-agent. The following setting is also
>> required in your
>> > >>>>>>>>> nova.conf: service_quantum_metadata_proxy=True
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Balamurugan V G <
>> > >>>>>>>>> balamuruganvg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> In Grizzly, when using quantum and overlapping IPs, does
>> metadata
>> > >>>>>>>>>> service work? This wasnt working in Folsom.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Balu
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> > >>>>>>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> > >>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> > >>>>>> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> > >>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> > Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
Follow ups
References
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Aaron Rosen, 2013-04-24
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Balamurugan V G, 2013-04-24
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Aaron Rosen, 2013-04-24
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Balamurugan V G, 2013-04-24
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Salvatore Orlando, 2013-04-24
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Balamurugan V G, 2013-04-24
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Balamurugan V G, 2013-04-24
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Aaron Rosen, 2013-04-24
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Balamurugan V G, 2013-04-25
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Aaron Rosen, 2013-04-25
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Leen Besselink, 2013-04-25
-
Re: [OpenStack] Grizzly: Does metadata service work when overlapping IPs is enabled
From: Balamurugan V G, 2013-04-25