openstack team mailing list archive
-
openstack team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #23642
Re: ConnectQuantum to VLAN-tagged physical network
Hi Angelo,
I had the same problem with you.
when I try:
# ovs-vsctl add-br br-dev
# ovs-vsctl add-port br-dev eth1 tag=108
and it doesn't work.
Does it mean we have to use vconfig to add a eth1.108 virtual interface,
and add it into bridge?
But OpenVSwitch suppose to support vlan directly.
That's a bit tricky.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Angelo Olivera <aolivera@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Salvatore, thanks for your reply. It took me a few tries but I finally
> solved this issue by creating the vlan devices on the respective
> interfaces, adding them to the corresponding bridges with ovs-vsctl
> and configuring two external networks with quantum.
>
> This would correspond to the "Multiple Flat Network" use case
> described in the Grizzly Networking Administration Guide[1], although
> the configuration is not explained. Quantum provides DHCP with default
> routes 10.33.8.1 (vlan 108) and 10.33.9.1 (vlan 109). Namespaces are
> used and there is one instance of the metadata proxy per each
> namespace.
>
> [1]
> http://docs.openstack.org/grizzly/openstack-network/admin/content/use_cases_multi_flat.html
>
> /etc/network/interfaces
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
>
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 10.33.10.210
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> gateway 10.33.10.1
>
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet manual
>
> auto eth1.108
> iface eth1.108 inet manual
> vlan-raw-device eth1
> up /sbin/ifconfig eth1.108 up
>
> auto eth1.109
> iface eth1.109 inet manual
> vlan-raw-device eth1
> up /sbin/ifconfig eth1.109 up
>
> /etc/quantum/quantum.conf
> [DEFAULT]
> lock_path = $state_path/lock
> bind_host = 0.0.0.0
> bind_port = 9696
> core_plugin =
> quantum.plugins.openvswitch.ovs_quantum_plugin.OVSQuantumPluginV2
> api_paste_config = /etc/quantum/api-paste.ini
> control_exchange = quantum
> rabbit_host = 10.33.10.210
> notification_driver = quantum.openstack.common.notifier.rpc_notifier
> default_notification_level = INFO
> notification_topics = notifications
> [QUOTAS]
> [DEFAULT_SERVICETYPE]
> [AGENT]
> root_helper = sudo quantum-rootwrap /etc/quantum/rootwrap.conf
> [keystone_authtoken]
> auth_host = 127.0.0.1
> auth_port = 35357
> auth_protocol = http
> admin_tenant_name = service
> admin_user = quantum
> admin_password = #######
> signing_dir = /var/lib/quantum/keystone-signing
>
> /etc/quantum/dhcp_agent.ini
> [DEFAULT]
> interface_driver = quantum.agent.linux.interface.OVSInterfaceDriver
> dhcp_driver = quantum.agent.linux.dhcp.Dnsmasq
> use_namespaces = True
> enable_isolated_metadata = True
>
> /etc/quantum/plugins/openvswitch/ovs_quantum_plugin.ini
> [DATABASE]
> sql_connection = mysql://quantum######@10.33.10.210/quantum?charset=utf8
> reconnect_interval = 2
> [OVS]
> # even when using flat networking these two variables had to be
> defined for the multiple physical networks to work
> tenant_network_type = vlan
> network_vlan_ranges = physdev:2048:4094,physqa:2048:4094
> bridge_mappings = physdev:br-dev,physqa:br-qa
> [AGENT]
> polling_interval = 2
> [SECURITYGROUP]
> firewall_driver =
> quantum.agent.linux.iptables_firewall.OVSHybridIptablesFirewallDriver
>
> # ovs-vsctl add-br br-int
> # ovs-vsctl add-br br-dev
> # ovs-vsctl add-port br-dev eth1.108
> # ovs-vsctl add-br br-qa
> # ovs-vsctl add-port br-qa eth1.109
> # quantum net-create --shared dev --provider:network_type flat
> --router:external=True --provider:physical_network physdev
> # quantum net-create --shared qa --provider:network_type flat
> --router:external=True --provider:physical_network physqa
> # quantum subnet-create dev 10.33.8.0/24 --name dev-subnet
> --allocation-pool start=10.33.8.10,end=10.33.8.254
> # quantum subnet-create qa 10.33.9.0/24 --name qa-subnet
> --allocation-pool start=10.33.9.10,end=10.33.9.254
>
> (Question also posted on
> https://answers.launchpad.net/quantum/+question/228437/)
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Angelo
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Salvatore Orlando <sorlando@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Your configuration looks correct, and provider networks are what you need
> > for implementing this use case.
> >
> > Is the traffic for your subnets improperly tagged, or are you unable at
> all
> > to forward traffic?
> > If you're not using GRE overlays it might make sense verifying that VLAN
> > 108/109 are allowed on physical switch ports or that the physical switch
> > ports are in trunk mode.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Salvatore
> >
> >
> > On 8 May 2013 20:21, Ashok Kumaran <ashokkumaran.b@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Angelo,
> >>
> >> This should be possible. Make sure that eth1 is connected to the Vlan
> >> trunk with necessary port configurations.
> >>
> >> Create 2 network with segmentation's ID as 108 and 109 respectively.
> >> Create the respective subnets for both network and then proceed with
> further
> >> configurations as needed. Are you facing any specific issues here?
> >>
> >> -Ashok
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Angelo Olivera <aolivera@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I am using Ubuntu 12.04 and OpenStack Grizzly from the Ubuntu Cloud
> >>> archive. I am trying to get instances to get an IP address from
> dnsmasq in
> >>> the 10.33.8.0/24 or 10.33.9.0/24 space and use physical routers at .1
> as
> >>> gateways. Furthermore, these two subnets should be tagged with VLANs
> 108 and
> >>> 109, respectively.
> >>>
> >>> Is this doable? I have been trying different configurations with Open
> >>> vSwitch to no avail. My network layout is as follows:
> >>>
> >>> Nodes
> >>> =====
> >>>
> >>> Controller, network, compute node (32-core system)
> >>> [eth0] 10.33.10.210. gateway: 10.33.10.1 (physical router)
> >>> [eth1] connected to VLAN port on switch
> >>>
> >>> Compute nodes
> >>> [eth0] 10.33.10.X
> >>> [eth1] connected to VLAN port on switch
> >>>
> >>> Logical networks
> >>> ============
> >>>
> >>> [net1]
> >>> vlan:108
> >>> cidr: 10.33.8.0/24
> >>> gateway: 10.33.8.1 (physical router)
> >>>
> >>> [net2]
> >>> vlan: 109
> >>> cidr: 10.33.9.0/24
> >>> gateway: 10.33.9.1 (physical router)
> >>>
> >>> One of the configurations I tested:
> >>>
> >>> /etc/quantum/plugins/openvswitch/ovs_quantum_plugin.ini
> >>> network_vlan_ranges = default:1:4094
> >>> bridge_mappings = default:br0
> >>>
> >>> ovs-vsctl add-br br-int
> >>> ovs-vsctl add-br br0
> >>> ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth1
> >>>
> >>> quantum net-create --shared net1 --provider:network_type vlan
> >>> --provider:physical_network default --provider:segmentation_id 108
> >>> quantum subnet-create net1 10.33.8.0/24
> >>> quantum subnet-create net2 10.33.9.0/24
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance!
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Angelo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regds,
> >>
> >> Ashok ,
> >> Delivery Consultant,
> >> HP.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to : openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
--
Thanks,
Yiting, Wu
Follow ups
References