oship-dev team mailing list archive

[Otavio Silva <otavio_uff104@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

________________________________
Otavio C. da Silva
Linux user: # 495191
Ubuntu user: # 28559




----- Mensagem encaminhada ----
De: Otavio Silva <otaviocsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Para: timothywayne.cook@xxxxxxxxx
Enviadas: Quarta-feira, 26 de Agosto de 2009 16:15:07
Assunto: diseases and diagnosis


   There is something that doesn fit in my mind about OpenEHR, or the way their archetypes are displayed in the it's site.
   When I first saw it, I saw with a "clinician's eye", and I found it perfect. It's all about medical semiology.
   Then I decided to view with an epidemiologist's eye. I found one problem: there is only one archetype called "diagnosis", and no archetype for diseases it self, a medical phylosofer would say it is perfect, because "diseases" don't really exist, but patients and sufferings...
   Reading the material (expecially overview.pdf and archetype_principles.pdf, in overview has very interesting chapter about it called "Entries and clinical statements") I saw that it is given much less importance to the diagnosis than we (doctors) are trained to.
   Am I missing something?
   I guess that to fill up dse and then epis3 we would have to build a way to solve it (archetypes, of course).

 
________________________________
Otavio C. da Silva
Linux user: # 495191
Ubuntu user: # 28559



________________________________
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! + Buscados: Top 10 - Celebridades - Música - Esportes


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com