oship-dev team mailing list archive

[Diego Manhães Pinheiro <dmpinheiro@xxxxxxxxx>]

2010/6/21 Luciana Tricai Cavalini <lutricav@xxxxxxxxx>

> Hi all,
>
> Hi all

> Some of us from Brazil had a meeting here and here are the questions that
> arouse:
>
> 1) After the upgrade to Grok 1.1, the test runner is not working anymore;
>
Now it's working again. I changed it at revision 426 (It is the last
revision while I'm writing this e-mail).

> 2) Now we know how to persist and retrieve data, we are just finishing
> doing that for the demographic use case, in order to retrieve name;
>
I commited a code that express how to search a party. My next step will be
include a legal identity to the search catalog (which applys only for Actor
Objects). The actual code is also at revision 426.

> 3) There are few details to finish implementing the RM, we got a list that
> is outdated: some things are already done, but some things are missing, but
> we are going to upload it on the OSHIP.org website;
> 4) We have doubts about the internal terminology server: how can we access
> it? Suggestion: using "utility" from Grok;
>
Here is a link to help explain better my suggestion :
http://grok.zope.org/doc/current/reference/components.html#grok.LocalUtility.
I Thought that it could be implemented using the mindset defined at the
specification : Using the Services[1] concept of Domain Driven Design.
[1] -
http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/08/21/services-in-domain-driven-design.aspx
.
There're several ways to express a behavior programmatically, of course. It
was just a suggestion.

5) A question: if we want to perform a search of an attribute that comes
> from the archetype, should we build catalogs from the attributes of the
> archetype?

6) If yes, does that mean that we need a catalog with all the attributes
> from the RM and from the archetypes?

7) The implementation has little connection between the Grok and the Python
> code, what to do?
>
> Sorry for the technical cluelessnes of the message, I was just the
> secretary of the meeting!
>
> Cheers, Luciana.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus e
> acredita-se estar livre de perigo.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~oship-dev
> Post to     : oship-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~oship-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
http://dmpinheiro.net
-----------------------------------
Diego Manhães Pinheiro
Linux User #375020