papercuts-ninja team mailing list archive

[Matthew Paul Thomas <mpt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
       Status: Triaged => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Papercuts
Ninjas, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314408

Title:
  Please separate automatically discovered remote printers from locally
  configured printers

Status in GTK+ GUI Toolkit:
  New
Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  Triaged
Status in Qt:
  New
Status in “gtk+3.0” package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in “qt4-x11” package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  The main reason why Debian/Ubuntu does not enable automatic use of
  network printers broadcasted by remote CUPS servers by default is that
  there is no way to tell apart locally configured (and thus trusted)
  printers from those which got advertized by remote CUPS servers (and
  thus open the possibility of luring someone into printing confidential
  material onto a rogue network printer).

  E. g. I have a locally configured "local_ps" printer, and an ML-1610
  configured on a remote server which appears through cups browsing
  detection. The print dialog currently looks like this:

    http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/screenshots/print_dialog_gtk.png

  the printers look exactly the same, I have no way to tell which ones
  can be considered trusted. It would be great to separate the locally
  configured from the remotely detected ones:

    |_| Print to file     |
    Locally configured printers:
    |=| HP DeskJet 123    | room 10  |
    |=| Samsung Foo Color |          |
    Automatically detected remote printers:
    |=| ML-1610           | dagobert |

  Locally configured and automatically discovered remote printers can be
  told apart with the CUPS_PRINTER_DISCOVERED flag (see cups/cups.h).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/314408/+subscriptions