papercuts-ninja team mailing list archive
-
papercuts-ninja team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01476
Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement
Hi,
What I don't understand is:
"2.3 Outbound License
Based on the grant of rights in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, if We
include Your Contribution in a Material, We may license the
Contribution under any license, including copyleft,
permissive, commercial, or proprietary licenses."
There is absolutely no reason to license it as proprietary software in the future?
Why not just use something like:
"We may license the
Contribution under any free and opensoure license" ?
Phillip
References
-
Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-12-29
-
Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement
From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-12-29
-
Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement
From: Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2014-12-29
-
Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement
From: Alberto Salvia Novella, 2014-12-29
-
Re: [Ubuntu-bugcontrol] Please, consider reflecting on the Canonical Contributor Agreement
From: Stephen M. Webb, 2014-12-29