← Back to team overview

percona-discussion team mailing list archive

Re: Why are bugs marked "invalid"?

 

Baron,

I think this is how Yasufumi handled transition from bugs to blue-prints.


On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Baron Schwartz <baron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I reported this bug,
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/percona-patches/+bug/320453
>
> Now I see it's marked "invalid" because it was moved to a blueprint:
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/percona-patches/+spec/control-page-fill-factor
>
> Is this the Launchpad way of linking feature requests?  It seems odd.
> I would think it would be put into "planned" or some similar status,
> and the bug report would be linked from the blueprint.  But I know
> nothing about Launchpad.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~percona-discussion
> Post to     : percona-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~percona-discussion
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>



-- 
Vadim Tkachenko, CTO, Percona Inc.
Phone +1-888-401-3403,  Skype: vadimtk153
Schedule meeting: http://tungle.me/VadimTkachenko



Follow ups

References