← Back to team overview

phatch-dev team mailing list archive

[Bug 398704] Re: Phatch - alteration svg > png > jpg

 

** Changed in: phatch
       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** Changed in: phatch
    Milestone: None => 0.2.1

-- 
Phatch - alteration svg > png > jpg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398704
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Phatch
Developers, which is subscribed to Phatch.

Status in Phatch = Photo & Batch!: Fix Released

Bug description:
Such as we had discussed with Stani to the Nantes's RMLL, I place you in join file an archive where you will find the various screen shots which will allow you to understand the problem I met concerning the conversion of the stemming .png of inkscape towards the .jpg format:

* 00_inkscape.svg
* 00_inkscape-export-150dpi.png
* 01_gimp_image-aplatie-enregistrement-jpg-100%.jpg
* 02_david-s_batch_processor_config_01.jpg
* 03_david-s_batch_processor_essai_01.jpg
* 04_david-s_batch_processor_config_02.jpg
* 05_david-s_batch_processor_essai_02.jpg
* 06_phatch_config.png
* 07_phatch-export.jpg
* 08_comparatif_rendus.jpg

In the file "00_inkscape.svg" you can realize that there is:

* a .png bitmap including a shade worn (which will maybe have disappeared well in the svg, link obliges)
* a shape rectangle black with alpha 75 %
* a 3D shape
* of the (editable) text 

To assure(insure) you a good comparison, I made the operation in passing:

* Directly in Gimp
  (c.f.: 01_gimp_image-aplatie-enregistrement-jpg-100%.jpg)
* then by way of the plugin " Of David Batch Processor "
  (c.f.: 02_david-s_batch_processor_config_01.jpg
          03_david-s_batch_processor_essai_01.jpg
          04_david-s_batch_processor_config_02.jpg
          05_david-s_batch_processor_essai_02.jpg)
* to finish by Phatch
  (c.f.: 06_phatch_config.png
          07_phatch-export.jpg)

You can realize by opening the file "08_comparatif_rendus.jpg" to a 100 % view that only the operation of conversion png > jpg made via a manual manipulation in Gimp (to flatten the image > to record under > .jpg in 100 %) can be considered as good rendering.

* The oblique lines become staircase with the plugin " Of David Batch Processor " or "Phatch" but just undergoes a weak vagueness via Gimp who remains acceptable.
* Texts are altered in the same way.
* The opaqueness of the shape rectangle black in 75 % is lost with the plugin " Of David Batch Processor " or "Phatch", and undergoes no change via Gimp
* The .png bitmap loses a big part of its transparency at the level of the shade worn with the plugin " Of David Batch Processor " or "Phatch", and undergoes no change via Gimp.

After all, the results with the plugin " Of David Batch Processor " or "Phatch" does not equal that obtained by a manual use of Gimp. = > in that very private individual case we agree :) !! 
Staying to your answer,
Itoun



References