registry team mailing list archive

[Bhavani Shankar <right2bhavi@xxxxxxxxx>]

hmm daniel I ll apply the upstream patch and i ll open a new upstream
request in debian

regards

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Holbach
<daniel.holbach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It was fixed in upstream like this: http://git.gnome.org/browse/sound-
> juicer/commit/?id=0adaffaea1028f5ef90f6aff675b9c81fbfb6a54 and is part
> of 2.31.6, maybe that should be packaged?
>
> --
> sound juicer ftbfs in maverick
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615439
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “sound-juicer” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
> Status in “sound-juicer” package in Debian: Unknown
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: sound-juicer
>
> Buildlogs:
>
> http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/32/sound-juicer_2.28.2-1_lubuntu32.buildlog
>
> http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/64/sound-juicer_2.28.2-1_lubuntu64.buildlog
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sound-juicer/+bug/615439/+subscribe
>


--

Bhavani Shankar.R
https://launchpad.net/~bhavi, a proud ubuntu community  member.
What matters in life is application of mind!,
It makes great sense to have some common sense..!

-- 
sound juicer ftbfs in maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615439
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry
Administrators, which is the registrant for Debian.