registry team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Bug 393923] Re: agg_rasterizer_cells_aa.h missing #includes <limits.h> and <stdlib.h> so it doesn't compile on new GCC versions

To: registry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:27:01 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 393923 <393923@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

> I think that arguments for upload patches is fact, that someone is
waiting for resolve the problem.

.. on jaunty?

> This upload shouldn't broke nothing important.

It mustn't break anything at all, I'm  afraid. So if the current
jaunty/karmic version does not work at all, then SRUing is safe. But if
only some use cases are broken, there is a regression potential, and the
bar is much higher. This one looks like it has a trivial workaround, and
isn't completely broken. On old releases (jaunty, karmic) we get very
little testing, so catching regressions is very hard. That's why we
stick very closely to the SRU rules for the older releases.

-- 
agg_rasterizer_cells_aa.h missing #includes <limits.h> and <stdlib.h> so it doesn't compile on new GCC versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393923
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry
Administrators, which is the registrant for Debian.