registry team mailing list archive

[Chuck Thier <638457@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not every process that uses it has access to the ring (for example the
object server), and the plan is to add a single conf file that it would
reside in

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Mike Barton
<638457@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> I guess I'd still like to know why it can't be in the ring structure.
> Putting it in every config file in the system is kind of lame.
>
> --
> Refactor SWIFT_HASH_PATH_SUFFIX to be in a config file
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638457
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Swift
> Bugs, which is subscribed to OpenStack Object Storage (swift).
>
> Status in OpenStack Object Storage (Swift): New
>
> Bug description:
> Refactor SWIFT_HASH_PATH_SUFFIX to be in a config file, and processes
> should refuse to run if it is not found.
>
>
>

-- 
Refactor SWIFT_HASH_PATH_SUFFIX to be in a config file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638457
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry
Administrators, which is subscribed to OpenStack Object Storage (swift).