registry team mailing list archive

[Prosthetic Head <propanone@xxxxxxxxx>]

Several bugs I'm on the list for have been retrospectively marked as
'Critical' after being closed as fixed. There may be a good reason for
this in each case, but given that several of them had no priority set or
were a lower priority and had been left unsolved for quite some time it
does look suspiciously like skewing of statistics. ('we've fixed X
critical bugs' or 'we fixed 97% of all critical bugs', etc., except that
they weren't critical until after they were fixed)

As I said, there may be a very good reason which I've missed or it could
be coincidence. I also apologise for posting this here as it may not be
the most appropriate place to raise such concerns, but I have no idea of
anywhere else more appropriate.

-- 
[apport] totem-video-thumbnailer crashed with SIGSEGV in decode_mb_cavlc()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99348
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry
Administrators, which is the registrant for GStreamer.