registry team mailing list archive
-
registry team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #20179
[Bug 648873] Re: [needs-packaging] Google Fonts
One thing to decide here: should we pull fonts from the upstream
projects (when they exist) or from the Google font directory (which
doesn't have proper "release packages"[1]? Unfortunately upstream
projects aren't linked directly from the directory...
At least Inconsolata and the Greek (gfs) & Khmer (khmeros) fonts are
already in the archive too, and there might be others.
The "template" OFL license text seems to have been added to some but not
all directories in hg by Raph Levien. In some cases, there is also
another license inside the font files, which makes things really
confusing... :-/
[1] seems to be
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/issues/detail?id=2
** Bug watch added: code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/issues #2
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/issues/detail?id=2
--
[needs-packaging] Google Fonts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648873
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry
Administrators, which is the registrant for Debian.