registry team mailing list archive
-
registry team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #24342
[Bug 633208] Re: Conflicts: dependencies without release misfire
So what to do for rpm5?
Okay with the following change, or should I push it under an #ifdef?
--- rpmdb/rpmevr.c~ 2010-03-06 17:20:46.000000000 +0100
+++ rpmdb/rpmevr.c 2010-10-15 20:21:28.120003324 +0200
@@ -277,6 +277,10 @@ assert(b->F[RPMEVR_D] != NULL);
for (s = rpmEVRorder(); *s != '\0'; s++) {
int ix;
+ if(*s == 'R' && (b->Flags & (~RPMSENSE_GREATER & RPMSENSE_EQUAL))
+ && *(b->F[RPMEVR_R]) == '\0')
+ break;
+
switch ((int)*s) {
default: continue; /*@notreached@*/ /*@switchbreak@*/break;
case 'E': ix = RPMEVR_E; /*@switchbreak@*/break;
--
Conflicts: dependencies without release misfire
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633208
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry
Administrators, which is the registrant for Unity Linux.