registry team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Bug 393012] Re: smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"

To: registry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Marten <393012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:38:45 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 393012 <393012@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I agree Amoor; this bug is critical but it is the release of Maverick
with bugs like #160311 that really makes me nervous about the future fit
and finish of the Ubuntu packaged GNOME desktop (to say nothing of the
ghastly state of Unity in 10.10). I accept that re-installing Lucid
would resolve most of the issues encountered with 10.10 but I'm baffled
as to why Canonical aren't making a public effort to repair the
credibility damage the presence of this bug and others in a "release"
version has done to them.

So how is the backport of this fix from samba.org into the Ubuntu
libsmbclient coming along?

-- 
smb: Error while copying file, "Invalid argument"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393012
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry
Administrators, which is the registrant for autofs.