← Back to team overview

registry team mailing list archive

[Bug 509061] Re: packaging of webkitimageqt

 

> I dont use bing. This is needed for custom WMS layers.

Standard wms and tms work out of the box, this is only required for the
"html:http://..."; kind of imagery source (e.g. yahoo).

> If there is an alternative package, then update the osm docs.

What's wrong with the docs at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/WMSPlugin ?

> Why do we need kde when we have gnome?

webkitimageqt and gnome-web-photo fulfil exactly the same task in this
case: load a url, render the content and output it in image format. If
there is any practical difference, you should point it out.

> That is not the question why does it take one more than one year for a
package to be integrated?

(not responsible for this)

> Whatever you do, please make sure that people who follow the osm
instructions know what to do to use custom wms layers.

What do you mean by that? Where is the documentation lacking?

> Also for the balkans, the yahoo images are better than bing, bing is useless
there.

Can you point me to a location?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Registry
Administrators, which is the registrant for Debian.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509061

Title:
  packaging of webkitimageqt 



Follow ups