rohc team mailing list archive

[afathy <question121378@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

New question #121378 on rohc:
https://answers.launchpad.net/rohc/+question/121378

Why in the code in c_generic.c, the  UO-1-ID is written as follows:

      0       1     2     3      4       5      6      7
    +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
     | 1      0    |T=0  |            IP-ID                     |
    +===+===+====+====+====+====+====+
     | M   |           SN                 |     CRC            | 
    +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

although in the RFC3095 5.7.3 page 81 it has an extension bit instead of the M bit


      0       1     2     3      4       5      6      7
    +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
     | 1      0    |T=0  |            IP-ID                     |
    +===+===+====+====+====+====+====+
     |  X   |           SN                 |     CRC            |  
    +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+

Thanks,
Ahmed

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of ROHC
Team, which is an answer contact for rohc.