rohc team mailing list archive
-
rohc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01591
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
Hello,
> I am just wondering if you have any comments on the packet samples
> I sent you - that packets that cause the tcp_decode_irregular_tcp
> routine to fail to decode the complete packet. You mentioned
> previously that the timestamp in one of my sample packets looked
> malformed. I am beginning to think the timestamp might be a
> problem, because I am seeing frequent PAWS (Prevention Against
> Wrapped Sequence) drops. This could only occur once in a blue moon.
> If I am seeing many of them, the timestamp, not the wraparound
> sequence, must be causing it.
Sorry, I didn't look yet at the latest packets that you sent me. I'll
look at them for sure, but I lacked time for it in the last few days.
Regards,
Didier
Follow ups
References
-
ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-03
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-06
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-07
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-08
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-08
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-09
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-14