rohc team mailing list archive
-
rohc team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01602
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
Hello,
> Here are a few packets I captured that caused the issues I sent to
> you:
>
> packet before compression:
> [...]
The ROHC packets seem well formed. It is one seq_1 packet.
The structure of the list at decompressor does not match the one of the
ROHC packet: the seq_1 got some bits for one SACK option, but the
decompressor doesn't know that option.
The seq_1 packet is not allowed if the structure of the TCP option list
changes, so either:
1/ The ROHC compressor didn't detected the change in the list
structure: not very probable since the option is present in the
seq_1 packet.
2/ The ROHC compressor created a ROHC seq_1 packet when it should have
not. I checked the code, there is no way to create a seq_1 packet
if the list structure changed, only co_common/seq_8/rnd_8 are
possible.
3/ The seq_1 packet is a late arrival. The list structure changed a
few packets before (SACK added), then changed a few packet after
(SACK removed). The packet is late, so it is received while the
list already changed back to its previous structure.
4/ The packets before the seq_1 packet were lost. The list structure
changed a few packet (SACK added), then changed a few packet after
(SACK removed). Because the packets that changed the list structure
were lost, the seq_1 packet is received with the old list structure.
The most probable cases are 3 and 4. To mitigate them, the compressor
should send several co_common/seq_8/rnd_8 packets with the changed
list structure before using other packet types, such as seq_1.
If I got enough time tomorrow, I'll try to make a change in this way.
Regards,
Didier
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Follow ups
References
-
ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-03
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-06
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-07
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-08
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-10
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Didier Barvaux, 2014-04-11
-
Re: ROHC TCP dynamic field changes
From: Wong, Tak - 0665 - MITLL, 2014-04-11