← Back to team overview

savanna-all team mailing list archive

Re: Hadoop Provider Integration

 

Hello Erik, team,

Below is the list of methods from Erik's team proposal, which functionality
is absent in our proposal. I would like to express my opinion on that.

Plugin API:
An interfaces exposed by plugin for Savanna

   - init() and shutdown() - I think it would be nice to provide plugin
   with these hooks.
   - get_management_URIs() - we don't have it, but we definitely need it.
   - get_cluster_status() - right now we show statuses from the viewpoint
   of Savanna  {STARTING, ACTIVE, SCALING}. Obviously it would be nice to
   display more detailed info about cluster health, so I guess we can use that
   method.
   - exec_resource_action() - As far as I understand, that method allows
   Savanna to execute arbitrary API call on the management tool. But that
   requires knowledge of the tool API on Savanna side, which is quite strange.
   Do we really need this or does it do something different?
   - get_node_template() - in our model, Savanna manages and stores all the
   configuration and does not need to query plugin to get config details. Do
   we still need to get some details from plugin? Any examples?


Savanna Context:
Interface exposed by Savann for plugin use

   - persist() and lookup() - we don't have them but we definitely need to
   provide persistence for plugin in some way. Sergey had an idea on how to do
   that, so I will leave it for him to comment.
   - exec_http_request() - right now we think that plugin should directly
   access the tool without any helper on Savanna side. With that approach
   plugin can leverage existing python client for the tool, instead of
   composing HTTP requests.
   - get_credentials() - since it will be responsibility of plugin to first
   setup the management tool and then communicate with it, I think it would
   make sense to provide plugin with facility for storing and retrieving
   credentials. We need to think on it further.
   - get_logger() - I am not yet sure, how are we going to provide logging
   facility to plugin. On the other hand, IMHO that is not very important and
   we can decide it later.


Cloud Context:
An interface exposing a single cluster for plugin

   - get_servers() - the server list is exposed via vm_specs.servers object


Server (VM Manager):
Provides interface for plugin to work with VMs
Basically we would like to provide plugin with only simple means to work
with VMs.

   - execute() - in your proposal that method executes a command in
   interactive manner, responding to command queries. We think that it is more
   appropriate to implement this command in non-interactive way. If a command
   requires some input, it could be provided via command arguments.
   - open_file() - again, we think it is better to provide plugin with more
   robust primitives like copy_to_vm() or copy_from_vm(). The open_file()
   working on remote host seems to be more complicated.


Thanks,

Dmitry



2013/5/3 Dmitry Mescheryakov <dmescheryakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Team,
>
> I've created the mockups for UI dialogs responsible for launching cluster
> and creating node template:
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/File:Savanna-create-cluster-mockup.png
>
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/File:Savanna-node-template-mockup.png
> I think they should help understand our view in the whole, and clarify our
> Plugin API design reasoning. IMHO, the create cluster dialog maps pretty
> nicely to cluster_description object from the Plugin API. The main thing
> which is different in the API is that Node Templates are replaced with
> configs.
>
> Initially we introduced Node Templates to let user specify some parameters
> only once during template creation. When user creates a cluster, he don't
> need to specify each parameter, he just needs to select one of the
> templates. To simplify Node Templates usage and management, we want to
> organize them in hierarchical structure, so that a template can extend
> another template. This approach will let user specify most parameters in
> base template, and override only few of them in each descending template.
>
> As you can see from the second mockup, a template in nutshell is just a
> list of key-value pairs.
>
> We don't want to burden plugin with processing Templates, deciding who
> inherits who, etc. We want Savanna to handle this and provide plugin only
> the resulting list of configs (key-value pairs), hence such transition from
> UI to API.
>
> Hope that clarifies,
>
> Dmitry
>
>
>
> 2013/5/2 Dmitry Mescheryakov <dmescheryakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> Erik, team,
>>
>> We've composed a document which more precisely describes our vision of
>> Plugin API:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/w/images/1/19/Savanna-plugin-api.pdf
>>
>> The document mostly focuses on describing functions we've already
>> introduced. And it almost does not incorporate your input yet, this is work
>> to be done.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dmitry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/5/1 Dmitry Mescheryakov <dmescheryakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>> *
>>>
>>> Hey Erik, team,
>>>
>>> Thank you for deeper dive into plugin mechanism architecture. That is
>>> really a step forward.
>>>
>>> Let us discuss the general approach first. When we started the
>>> architecture design, we also first thought of an IoC concept, similar to
>>> what you suggest. But after some thinking, we found that it is better to
>>> split one big “create cluster” call into a number of smaller ones,
>>> retaining more control on the core side. The benefits of such approach (and
>>> disadvantages of the opposite one) are:
>>>
>>> * In case of one “create cluster” call each plugin will be allowed to
>>> have different behavior, which means we will introduce a lot of undefined
>>> behavior. Especially in error cases, because each plugin could handle error
>>> case differently. Another thing is that handling such cases might require
>>> deep knowledge of OpenStack from plugin creator. Our goal is to simplify
>>> plugin creation process by handling all the OpenStack related logic inside
>>> the Savanna code, not in the plugin code.
>>>
>>> In case of separate calls for each step:
>>>
>>> * Plugin is separated into several consecutive parts/methods.
>>> Transitions between these methods might be persisted which would increase
>>> reliability of the workflow.
>>>
>>> In perspective, it might allow to run plugin in distributed environment.
>>>
>>> * Separate and defined by API plugin methods allow code reuse. It also
>>> serves as a documentation of plugins responsibilities.
>>>
>>> * It’ll allow timeout handling for each step on the core side.
>>>
>>>
>>> Methods for interacting directly with a VM/Server instance like
>>> install(), open_file(), interactive execute() don’t seem to be relevant to
>>> the Plugin API. It’s better to keep such method away from the API to keep
>>> that API as simple as possible. It can be just a set of helper methods
>>> under utils package.
>>>
>>> We suggest to move provider specific details to separate blueprints.
>>> Examples are “HDP specific details” in create cluster flow and in add hosts
>>> flow.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Dmitry, on behalf of Mirantis team
>>>
>>> *
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/4/30 Erik Bergenholtz <ebergenholtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>> Dmitry - uploaded a new doc that looks a bit better:
>>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/w/images/5/5e/Savanna_Deployment_Engine_Architecture.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Erik
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 30, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Dmitry Mescheryakov <
>>>> dmescheryakov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Erik,
>>>>
>>>> Some tables in "Savanna Deployment Engine Architecture" doc are
>>>> flattened out, see attached screenshot for example. Could you reassemble
>>>> the PDF with correct tables' sizes?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Dmitry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/4/30 Erik Bergenholtz <ebergenholtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>>> Team - yet another update. See
>>>>> https://wiki.openstack.org/w/images/9/97/Savanna_hadoop_host_group_mapping.pdf for
>>>>> a document illustrating how hadoop nodes get mapped to provisioned VMs.
>>>>> Erik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 30, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Erik Bergenholtz <
>>>>> ebergenholtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Team,  John has updated the below referenced documents with better
>>>>> descriptions of the flows (same links apply).
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Erik
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 30, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Erik Bergenholtz <
>>>>> ebergenholtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Team,
>>>>>
>>>>> Below are a few documents intended to describe only a slightly
>>>>> modified approach to hadoop provider integration into Savanna (see existing
>>>>> blueprint in draft:
>>>>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/savanna/+spec/pluggable-cluster-provisioning). These
>>>>> documents should not be considered a blueprint, but a vehicle for
>>>>> continuing discussion on the topic.
>>>>>
>>>>> To summarize there are two changes to note:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. There is some IoC introduced into the design allowing hadoop plugin
>>>>> providers flexibility to integrate into Savanna while reducing the burden
>>>>> on the Savanna controller itself. This differs from the current approach of
>>>>> the controller invoking APIs on the provider at specific lifecycle points.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Attempts have been made to keep normalization of management APIs
>>>>> across providers at a minimum at the controller level. Our view is that
>>>>> existing Hadoop users are already familiar with their Hadoop distribution
>>>>> management API (CDH, Ambari, MapR etc.) and as such would want to leverage
>>>>> existing investments vs. learning a new management API specific to Savanna.
>>>>> This eases adoption and lowers the barrier of entry of adoption of Hadoop
>>>>> on OpenStack.
>>>>>
>>>>> Documents to review:
>>>>>
>>>>> Savanna Deployment Engine Architecture<https://wiki.openstack.org/w/images/5/5e/Savanna_Deployment_Engine_Architecture.pdf> -
>>>>> Puts forth the architecture of the deployment engine
>>>>> Savanna_add_hosts_flow<https://wiki.openstack.org/w/images/d/dc/Savanna_add_hosts_flow.pdf> -
>>>>> Describes sequence of steps executed in order to add a host to an existing
>>>>> Hadoop Cluster
>>>>> Savanna_create_cluster_flow<https://wiki.openstack.org/w/images/0/0f/Savanna_create_cluster_flow.pdf> -
>>>>> Describes the sequence of steps executed in order to create a new cluster
>>>>> Savanna_invoke_provider_rest_api_flow<https://wiki.openstack.org/w/images/a/a6/Savanna_invoke_provider_rest_api_flow.pdf> -
>>>>> Describes the sequence of steps executed in a REST request by the provider
>>>>> plugin on the controller.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review at your earliest convenience and let us know your
>>>>> feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon Maron, John Speidel and Erik Bergenholtz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~savanna-all
>>>>> Post to     : savanna-all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~savanna-all
>>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> <Screen Shot 2013-04-30 at 1.15.11 PM.png>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Follow ups

References