sikuli-driver team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

[Question #578460]: What tesseract related improvements are expected with Sikuli 2?

To: sikuli-driver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Eugene S <question578460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:23:19 -0000
Reply-to: question578460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

New question #578460 on Sikuli:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/578460

Hi RaiMan,

The question about tesseract performance have been asked here many times and in one of your answers you mentioned that some improvements are expected in Sikuli 2. 

Now as far as I understand, the issues that most people experience with Sikuli + tesseract (unreliable results...) are just a result of how tesseract itself works. So the poor results that tesseract based detection provides have nothing to do with Sikuli. And if that's the case I would be really interested to know what improvements you are planning to introduce? 

I would think that the only way to go is to configure and train tesseract itself.


Thanks,
Eugene

-- 
You received this question notification because your team Sikuli Drivers
is an answer contact for Sikuli.