sikuli-driver team mailing list archive

[RaiMan <sikulix@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

All the best for your holidays.

I made some tests now with 1.1.3 and have to admit, that exists() and
findAll() might not always give the same result.

See the documented workaround.


** Summary changed:

- [1.1.3] findAll fails but image exists --- workaround
+ [1.1.3] findAll fails but image exists --- workaround --- fixed in 1.1.4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Sikuli
Drivers, which is subscribed to Sikuli.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833356

Title:
  [1.1.3] findAll fails but image exists --- workaround --- fixed in
  1.1.4

Status in Sikuli:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  ******************************** workaround

  ;-) best workaround is to use 1.1.4

  for 1.1.3:
  using exists(), wait() or find() and getting a similarity score of x, then with findAll() the same image might come up with a score of x - 0.03 down to x - 0.1.

  so using

  exists(Pattern(someImage).similar(score))

  then this will assure, to come back with the same result (first
  match):

  findAll(Pattern(someImage).similar(score - 0.1))

  ----------------------------------------------------

  Code
  def Find_All_Close_X(v_Image):
      if exists(v_Image,0.2):
          v_Pos = find(v_Image)
          print "v_Pos",v_Pos
          hover(Location(v_Pos.x,v_Pos.y))
          print "hovering",v_Pos.x,v_Pos.y
          popup("Found and hovering")
          v_Result = findAll(v_Image)
      else:
          print "Not Found"
  v_Image_p = "/home/jeff/SikuliScripts_Linux/Subs/Vikings/Close X big Region.png"
  sx = 422 ; sy = 132 ; sw = 505 ; sh = 270
  setRect(sx,sy,sw,sh)
  g_Find_Matching = 0.85
  for i in range(20):
      print "^ " * 40 ,"Try", g_Find_Matching
      v_Image = Pattern(v_Image_p).similar(g_Find_Matching)

      Find_All_Close_X(v_Image)
      g_Find_Matching = g_Find_Matching - 0.01

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sikuli/+bug/1833356/+subscriptions