sikuli-driver team mailing list archive
-
sikuli-driver team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #59457
Re: [Question #817992]: Sikuli in a virtual framebuffer Xvnc (no VNCScreen)
Question #817992 on SikuliX changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/sikuli/+question/817992
Luca Andreucci gave more information on the question:
Although quite obvious, this is what your friendly neighborhood LLM spat
out:
In the context of the Remote Framebuffer Protocol (RFB) used by VNC
(Virtual Network Computing), a virtual framebuffer behaves differently
when no clients are connected compared to when a client is connected due
to the way the framebuffer is managed and updated.
### 1. **Framebuffer Updates:**
- **No Clients Connected:** When no clients are connected to the virtual framebuffer, the server may not actively update the framebuffer's contents. This is because there is no external party (i.e., a VNC client) requesting updates or changes. The virtual framebuffer could be in a state where updates are either paused or significantly throttled, saving resources like CPU and network bandwidth.
- **Client Connected:** When a client connects, the server begins to actively manage and update the framebuffer. The client will periodically request updates to the framebuffer's contents, and the server must respond with the current state of the framebuffer, including any changes. This involves more frequent updates to the framebuffer data to ensure the client has the most current view.
### 2. **Event Handling and Resource Allocation:**
- **No Clients Connected:** Without any clients connected, the virtual framebuffer may operate in a minimal mode, where it does not need to process input events (like mouse movements or keyboard presses) because there is no client sending them. Additionally, resource allocation might be reduced because the system isn't required to maintain an active communication channel or prepare data for transmission.
- **Client Connected:** Once a client connects, the server must handle input events from the client and possibly other events like clipboard data sharing. The server needs to allocate resources to manage these tasks, which may include buffering inputs, handling display updates, and managing network connections.
### 3. **Lazy or Deferred Updates:**
- **No Clients Connected:** Some virtual framebuffer implementations might employ lazy or deferred updates when no clients are connected. This means the framebuffer content may only be updated when necessary or on a significant event (like a display change), reducing unnecessary processing.
- **Client Connected:** With a connected client, updates are usually more immediate. The protocol may enforce or assume that the server needs to respond promptly to changes, so the virtual framebuffer is kept current with more frequent updates to ensure the client receives real-time or near-real-time information.
### 4. **Optimization for Performance:**
- **No Clients Connected:** Without clients, the virtual framebuffer server might enter a low-power or low-performance state to conserve resources. Since there’s no one to display to, it can afford to optimize for reduced performance.
- **Client Connected:** With an active connection, the server optimizes for performance to ensure smooth interaction. It might utilize more CPU, memory, and network resources to manage the connection efficiently, deliver updates quickly, and respond to client actions.
### 5. **Protocol-Specific Behavior:**
- **No Clients Connected:** Some implementations of RFB might include specific optimizations or behaviors that trigger when there are no clients connected. For example, it might skip certain internal processes or maintenance tasks that are only necessary when serving a connected client.
- **Client Connected:** Upon detecting a client, the server will engage in full protocol compliance, including handshakes, authentication, and maintaining the protocol state. The server is now in a mode where it must adhere to the specifications of the RFB protocol to facilitate smooth communication.
### Conclusion:
The primary reason for the difference in behavior lies in the need to conserve resources and reduce unnecessary work when no clients are connected. In contrast, when a client is connected, the virtual framebuffer must actively manage updates, handle events, and maintain the state to provide a responsive and accurate remote display. The RFB protocol's design takes these factors into account to ensure efficient operation in both scenarios.
--
You received this question notification because your team Sikuli Drivers
is an answer contact for SikuliX.