simple-scan-team team mailing list archive

[ossjunkie <667220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry for my late response, but no i didn't use an ADF and as you can
see i was much too fast in feeding new content because of those UI lags.
As i said this wasn't the case with pre 2.32 releases. I will recheck
all this, because the next LTS will have the newer series and scanning
should be really smooth in time for precise.

BTW upgrading Simple Scan doesn't have an effect on Xsane when you don't
switch the underlaying libaries or the whole Ubuntu release.

Regarding confirmation of other just use a lucid system with default
Simple Scan and then use a newer release for scanning multiple pages, it
should be pretty obvious.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple
Scan Development Team, which is the registrant for Simple Scan.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667220

Title:
  Regression from 1.0 to 2.32 - slower scan process

Status in Simple Scan:
  New
Status in “simple-scan” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The 2.32 series seems to be slower on scanning than the 1.0.x series.
  This is because there is a longer break between scans, while the speed
  of the scanner is about the same. It seems that the UI is lagging
  behind the real process on the scanner, so the "cursor" on screen is
  about half of the scanned page while the image sensor already reached
  it's end position. Then the image sensor is waiting for the UI cursor
  to reach it's end before it returning to start. This results in a
  longer break between scans.

  This was not the case in 1.0.x and when scanning multiple pages it
  really slows things down.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/simple-scan/+bug/667220/+subscriptions