sts-sponsors team mailing list archive
-
sts-sponsors team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00402
[Bug 1734983] Re: Request to backport sosreport v3.5
Hello Eric, or anyone else affected,
Accepted sosreport into artful-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/3.5-1~ubuntu17.10.2 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from
verification-needed-artful to verification-done-artful. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-failed-artful. In either case, without details of
your testing we will not be able to proceed.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Artful)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags removed: verification-failed-artful
** Tags added: verification-needed-artful
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of STS
Sponsors, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734983
Title:
Request to backport sosreport v3.5
Status in sosreport:
New
Status in sosreport package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in sosreport source package in Trusty:
In Progress
Status in sosreport source package in Xenial:
Fix Committed
Status in sosreport source package in Zesty:
Won't Fix
Status in sosreport source package in Artful:
Fix Committed
Status in sosreport source package in Bionic:
Fix Released
Status in sosreport package in Debian:
New
Bug description:
[Impact]
Canonical support team (AKA STS) largely depend on sosreport package
to troubleshoot system.
sosreport is always in constant development including new bugfixes,
new features such as new plugins[1], .... that can be interesting to
have in a support context.
v3.5 is already found in devel release (bionic). We create this LP in
the attempt to justify the SRU of v3.5 backport into current supported
stable releases.
[1] - New plugins for :
* perl
* boom
* vdo
* os_net_config
* conntrackd
* ovirt_imageio
* nss
* sas3ircu
* openstack_aodh
* docker_distribution
* gluster_block
* snappy
Plugin API enhancements
* Plugin triggers by executable name
* Improved log size limit handling
* Better handling of compressed log files
* Per-plugin package verification lists
Updates to 227 plugins
This will also allow us to close some sosreport LP bugs:
*Docker plugin uses the wrong command for Ubuntu (LP: #1693574)
[Test Case]
* Install sosreport
$ apt-get install sosreport
* Run sosreport
$ sosreport -a
$ sosreport -o <PLUGIN>
$ ...
* Make sure it generate a tar.xz file in /tmp in the form of
"/tmp/sosreport-<HOSTNAME>-<DATE>.tar.xz"
* Extract files from archive
$ tar Jxvf /tmp/sosreport-<HOSTNAME>-<DATE>.tar.xz
* Look the content of sosreport, make sure the information is
accurate and valid, ....
* Make sure all files that should to be collected by sosreport aren't 0 size. (Files that should be collected may varies from one system to another, it depends on what packages are installed, ...)
$ find /tmp/sosreport-<HOSTNAME>-<DATE> -size 0
# Note :
It is normal to see some 0 size files here and there, again it depend on how the plugin is run (package detection or not inside the plugins, ...) and if the package is installed or not on the system where you run sosreport. But in most cases, if the package is installed and if sosreport has a plugin for it then it should gather information, if not then it might be a problem with the plugins itself that need adjustments.
[Regression Potential]
* autopkgtest[2] didn't reveal any
[2] - See Comment #1
* We,STS, have intensively tested the package.
During our testing, we found a severe regression that we already took
action to fix it via :
- Upstream issue - https://github.com/sosreport/sos/issues/1155
- Debian bug - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883537
- Fix Released in Ubuntu Devel release (bionic) via debdiff : lp1734983_bionic.debdiff
[Other Info]
* Sosreport upstream :
https://github.com/sosreport/sos
* rmadison -u debian,ubuntu sosreport
debian:
sosreport | 3.2-2 | oldstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
sosreport | 3.2-2 | oldstable-kfreebsd | source, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
sosreport | 3.3+git50-g3c0349b-2 | stable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
sosreport | 3.5-1 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
sosreport | 3.5-1 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
ubuntu:
sosreport | 3.0-1~ubuntu12.04.1 | precise-backports/universe | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, powerpc
sosreport | 3.1-1ubuntu2 | trusty | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el
sosreport | 3.1-1ubuntu2.2 | trusty-security | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el
sosreport | 3.2-2~ubuntu14.04.1 | trusty-backports | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el
sosreport | 3.2+git276-g7da50d6-3ubuntu1 | xenial | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
sosreport | 3.3+git50-g3c0349b-2 | zesty | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
sosreport | 3.4-1~ubuntu14.04.1 | trusty-updates | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el
sosreport | 3.4-1~ubuntu16.04.1 | xenial-updates | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x
sosreport | 3.4-1~ubuntu17.04.1 | zesty-updates | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
sosreport | 3.4-1 | artful | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
sosreport | 3.5-1 | bionic | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sosreport/+bug/1734983/+subscriptions