sts-sponsors team mailing list archive

[Heitor Alves de Siqueira <halves@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Matthew,

I've taken a look at this, and overall your patches look good. I've added
an author attribution for Didier Roche to d/changelog as he's the original
author of the patch, but kept your changes as-is otherwise.
I'd like to clear out a few points on the "0.11.0 being backported"
situation, just so we don't risk trampling over a future upload for adsys:

- do you know who's doing the 0.11 backport to F/J/K? is this being
coordinated with SEG/you?
- is it going to land as a regular package in -updates, or is it going to
be available through -backports?
- is there any timeframe on when 0.11.0 would be made available? (i.e.
would waiting for that release with a hotfix be an appropriate alternative
in this case, or not because AWS is being AWS)

If those aren't an issue, I have the package sources ready to go and will
upload them tomorrow. Thanks again for the help!

Cheers,
Heitor

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 2:16 AM Matthew Ruffell <
matthew.ruffell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Can you please review and sponsor adsys in LP #2020834?
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2020834
>
> The package unfortunately uses d/source/format of "3.0 (native)" over
> "3.0 (quilt)", so the debdiffs are created in native form not using
> quilt.
>
> If this is incorrect, let me know, I have properly dep3 tagged
> patches, but just need to know how to apply them since I can't use
> quilt.
>
> There is 0.11.0 being backported to F/J/K, but AWS are in a real hurry
> to get this fixed, so here we are.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthew
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~sts-sponsors
> Post to     : sts-sponsors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~sts-sponsors
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>