svn team mailing list archive
-
svn team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00006
Re: About to merge with Debian's Subversion 1.6.9dfsg-1
Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> On Wed, 5 May 2010, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 May 2010, Michael Diers wrote:
>>> subversion (1.6.9dfsg-1ubuntu0~svn1~karmic1) karmic; urgency=low
>> For this special case I recommend -1ubuntu0svn1.
>
> Oh, maxb’s email reminded me I forgot to mention the ~karmic1 suffix. I
> recommend
>
> subversion (1.6.9dfsg-1ubuntu0svn1) lucid
> subversion (1.6.9dfsg-1ubuntu0svn1~karmic1) karmic
> subversion (1.6.9dfsg-1ubuntu0svn1~jaunty1) jaunty
>
> etc., considering all the previous versions to be “backports” of the lucid
> package.
>
> Anders
Oh dear.
Juliet:
"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet."
Romeo and Juliet (II, ii, 1-2)
Anders, Max, thanks a lot for the explanation.
To me, encoding this sort of complex information in a _name_, seems
wrong, wrong, wrong. Isn't this an instance where Resource Description
Framework (RDF) or something similar should come into play?
What the hey, I guess I'll just follow your recommendations.
--
Michael Diers, elego Software Solutions GmbH, http://www.elego.de
References