syfi team mailing list archive

[Martin Sandve Alnæs <martinal@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ok. It's only a few places in test scripts I need to update for this.

Martin


2009/3/26 Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>

> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:41:29PM +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> > This should rather be fixed in dolfin and ffc instead.
> >
> > 1) The module isn't needed, the module can always
> > be obtained from compiled_form.__module__.
> >
> > 2) We don't need to return the form_data either,
> > since it can be obtained from ufl_form.form_data()
> > (it's attached there the first time it is computed).
> >
> > So we can just return the compiled module.
> >
> > I want to do it this way:
> >
> > single_compiled_form = jit(single_ufl_form)
> > single_compiled_element = jit(single_ufl_element)
> > compiled_object_list = jit(ufl_object_list)
> >
> > where single_compiled_element is a
> > tuple(single_compiled_finite_element, single_compiled_dof_map)
> >
> > and compiled_object_list is an ordered list matching the
> > ufl_object_list where each item can be either a single ufl form or
> element.
>
> Sounds good. But does this need to be done *now* or can it wait until
> we've moved the JIT compilation to a common module in UFC?
>
> I'm hoping we can make a new release of FFC pretty soon with
> experimental support for UFL and then make cleanups and fixes
> for the next release (and remove .form support).
>
> There will be a few things to do like using ufl.load_forms, using
> dolfin_utils for generating DOLFIN code and changing the JIT
> interface. It would be practical if those could wait until after the
> release.
>
> --
> Anders
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAknKvCMACgkQTuwUCDsYZdHZwwCbBiYVvWyT345+TLjSII03TNzl
> V2gAn2jQuzElX4vzNiLRDk77cmPQwPaj
> =kYLB
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> SyFi-dev mailing list
> SyFi-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/syfi-dev
>
>