← Back to team overview

terminator-users team mailing list archive

Re: Terminator testing options

 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've been learning to package. I'd be happy to work with this. Say
weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, etc. builds in the PPA.

The terminator package has been one I've been using to learn how to
package so I'm somewhat familiar with it. I assume the makefile will
undergo big changes as well.

If you want I could just build it in my own PPA. It would be great
practice for me and you wouldn't need to focus on that. I'd be up for
trying to keep the man page up to date as well.

On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:12:06 +0100
chantra <chantra@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> PPA would be could to be able to get more people to test the new
> versions without going through bzr pull and install.
> I guess by now, Ubuntu users are used to PPA.
> 
> For the rest of the community, either we could get a sponsor to create
> packages for mainstream distros. 
> 
> Then, for the developer community, people will still rely on source.
> 
> Manu
> 
> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 08:42 +0000, Chris Jones wrote:
> 
> > Hey folks
> > 
> > I realised that the terminator-users mailing list had never had any
> > posts, so I thought I'd kick things off by asking for your opinions!
> > 
> > Over the last 6 months I've been working on a completely new core for
> > Terminator - literally every single line of the code has been rewritten
> > or refactored. The result is a much, much more flexible and robust
> > architecture to carry us forward to a 1.0 release.
> > 
> > However, such an invasive change is bound to have created a large number
> > of regressions and new bugs. I've already found and fixed a lot of these
> > myself or with informal help from the folks on #terminator, but I'd like
> > to cast the net a little wider, and since you good people have indicated
> > that you use Terminator, I'd be interested to get your help!
> > 
> > The question is how to go about it - are you comfortable checking out
> > bzr branches, or would you prefer a full alpha/beta release with
> > tarballs, or are enough of you Ubuntu users that a separate PPA with
> > testing releases would be best?
> > 
> > Discuss :)
> > 
> > Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> !DSPAM:4b6af1d761676960285278!


- -- 
Michael Lustfield
Kalliki Software

Network and Systems Administrator
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktrDS8ACgkQ3y7Nst6YLGWihwCeKHE8PhIjNz2sP3906FCY69Ca
dT0An1W4IjWsQO6M/jkiGN7LGFxK5ujc
=nz3P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow ups

References