← Back to team overview

testrepository-dev team mailing list archive

Re: 1.0 time?

 

SGTM.

On Thu Nov 13 2014 at 10:02:43 AM Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> On 28 August 2014 05:42, Jonathan Lange <jml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have no objections.
>
> Cool
>
> > It would be good to be explicit about what backwards compatibility
> promises
> > we're making with 1.0.
> >
> > i.e. which of
> >
> > API
>
> I think we should hold any API we advertise as stable stable. We may
> want to introduce new APIs in an unstable fashion. Today we don't
> offer an API at all IMO.
>
> > configuration format
> > command-line interface
>
> Yes and yes.
>
> > storage format
>
> I think we should guarantee that new releases can read old releases,
> but not that for any two pairs of releases that they are
> bidirectionally compatible.
>
> > are we planning to hold stable, and under what conditions.
>
> -Rob
>
> --
> Robert Collins <rbtcollins@xxxxxx>
> Distinguished Technologist
> HP Converged Cloud
>

References