testtools-dev team mailing list archive

[Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok so I'm going to add a backwards compat statement to hacking etc,
and then when that gets approved the next release will be 1.0.0..

-Rob

On 30 January 2014 09:38, Jonathan Lange <jml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +1, although my understanding is that our backwards compat breaks have
> almost always been unintentional.
>
> Is our test set up such that we can reasonably make this commitment?
>
> If we had more time/energy, it'd be nice to do a quick review of the exposed
> API that we're committing ourselves to.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> we broke subunit by removing 'all' so there was a firedrill there.
>>
>> I think it's time we did a 1.0.0 and committed to not breaking
>> backwards compat without doing 2.0.0
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> --
>> Robert Collins <rbtcollins@xxxxxx>
>> Distinguished Technologist
>> HP Converged Cloud
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~testtools-dev
>> Post to     : testtools-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~testtools-dev
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>



-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcollins@xxxxxx>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud