tiomap-dev team mailing list archive
-
tiomap-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00737
Re: [Bug 873453] Re: odd timing behaviour on panda
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Ricardo Salveti <rsalveti@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:14 AM, warmcat <873453@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Just to be super paranoid, Dave is using 4460 Panda I believe, is
>> everyone with the problem using 4430?
>
> I'm also testing it on a 4460. Last I check I was also able to
> reproduce this on my 4430, but will double check again.
That's interesting, I'm unable to reproduce the issue on my 4430 when
using the tilt-tracking kernel. Just used the same SD card I'm able to
reproduce the issue on my 4460.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of TI OMAP
Developers, which is subscribed to linaro-landing-team-ti.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873453
Title:
odd timing behaviour on panda
Status in Linaro Texas Instruments Landing Team:
Confirmed
Status in Linaro Ubuntu Evaluation Builds:
Confirmed
Bug description:
I've got a set of benchmarks that use clock_gettime like:
clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &tbefore);
for(l=0;l<numloops;l++) {
dostuff
}
clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &tafter);
nsdiff=(double)(tafter.tv_nsec - tbefore.tv_nsec);
nsdiff+=1000000000.0 *(tafter.tv_sec - tbefore.tv_sec);
and I've just reinstalled our local panda to using Linaro 11.09 (kernel 3.0.0-1404-linaro-lt-omap)
and it's starting to get weird timing artifacts.
For example:
smarter_strlen_ldrd: ,102400, loops of ,62, bytes=6.054688 MB, transferred in ,3936768.000000 ns, giving, 1537.984331 MB/s
smarter_strlen_ldrd: ,102400, loops of ,32, bytes=3.125000 MB, transferred in ,0.000000 ns, giving, inf MB/s
smarter_strlen_ldrd: ,102400, loops of ,16, bytes=1.562500 MB, transferred in ,4180909.000000 ns, giving, 373.722557 MB/s
Now there is no way that loop took 0.000000 ns! Running the same
binary on an older installation runs fine.
Dave
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-landing-team-ti/+bug/873453/+subscriptions
References