touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

In https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-w-networkd-
vs-ifupdown we want to provide networkd as a viable option for Ubuntu,
in particular server/cloud land. This requires some integration with
existing packages, in particular calling the /etc/network/if-up.d/ and
if-post-down.d/ scripts, similar to what NetworkManager does.

I would like to land this in wily still, so that people can experiment
it and we still have some time to tweak it  for 16.04 LTS:

    http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-
systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=27f7cc9f9f32

As we don't currently use (or even advertise) networkd in Ubuntu, the
risk of this is very low IMHO. The main regression risk is if that would
somehow influence/break interfaces managed by ifupdown or
NetworkManager, but the above changes test if the interface is managed
by networkd.

We also want to provide integration with "resolvconf". This does not
exist yet, but FFE wise it would be very similar; so perhaps this could
get some pre-approval to avoid some paperwork?

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Wishlist
         Status: New

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Wishlist

** Description changed:

  In https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-w-networkd-
  vs-ifupdown we want to provide networkd as a viable option for Ubuntu,
  in particular server/cloud land. This requires some integration with
  existing packages, in particular calling the /etc/network/if-up.d/ and
  if-post-down.d/ scripts, similar to what NetworkManager does.
  
  I would like to land this in wily still, so that people can experiment
  it and we still have some time to tweak it  for 16.04 LTS:
  
-     http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-
+     http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-
  systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=27f7cc9f9f32
  
  As we don't currently use (or even advertise) networkd in Ubuntu, the
  risk of this is very low IMHO. The main regression risk is if that would
  somehow influence/break interfaces managed by ifupdown or
  NetworkManager, but the above changes test if the interface is managed
  by networkd.
+ 
+ We also want to provide integration with "resolvconf". This does not
+ exist yet, but FFE wise it would be very similar; so perhaps this could
+ get some pre-approval to avoid some paperwork?

** Summary changed:

- FFE: integrate networkd with /etc/network/if-*.d/ scripts
+ FFE: integrate networkd with /etc/network/if-*.d/ scripts and resolvconf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492129

Title:
  FFE: integrate networkd with /etc/network/if-*.d/ scripts and
  resolvconf

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-w
  -networkd-vs-ifupdown we want to provide networkd as a viable option
  for Ubuntu, in particular server/cloud land. This requires some
  integration with existing packages, in particular calling the
  /etc/network/if-up.d/ and if-post-down.d/ scripts, similar to what
  NetworkManager does.

  I would like to land this in wily still, so that people can experiment
  it and we still have some time to tweak it  for 16.04 LTS:

      http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-
  systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=27f7cc9f9f32

  As we don't currently use (or even advertise) networkd in Ubuntu, the
  risk of this is very low IMHO. The main regression risk is if that
  would somehow influence/break interfaces managed by ifupdown or
  NetworkManager, but the above changes test if the interface is managed
  by networkd.

  We also want to provide integration with "resolvconf". This does not
  exist yet, but FFE wise it would be very similar; so perhaps this
  could get some pre-approval to avoid some paperwork?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1492129/+subscriptions