touch-packages team mailing list archive
-
touch-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #11131
[Bug 1354306] Re: gpio shutdown trigger for ProLiant m400 cartridges
Hello dann, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/204-5ubuntu20.5
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1354306
Title:
gpio shutdown trigger for ProLiant m400 cartridges
Status in systemd:
Confirmed
Status in “systemd” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in “systemd” source package in Trusty:
Fix Committed
Status in “systemd” source package in Utopic:
Fix Released
Bug description:
Similar to the m800 case in LP: #1347776, udev/systemd also needs to
know how to trigger a graceful shutdown on ProLiant m400 cartridges.
[Impact]
Without this change, the power down button will not initiate an OS shutdown on this platform.
[Test Case]
Push button. Watch poweroff occur.
[Regression Potential]
The new rule is pretty tightly bound to the m400 system - so the risk of this rule matching and impacting behavior on a different platform is minimal. This will presumably cause new code to run and read /proc/device-tree/model on other platforms - but this is already done for the m800 system in both utopic and trusty.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1354306/+subscriptions
References