touch-packages team mailing list archive
-
touch-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #126824
[Bug 1531404] Re: nonexistent partition in /dev, & lsblk/disk util misbehaving with randomized disks
Prompted by a chat on #ubuntu-bugs, I'll point this out:
(1) Since an MBR has a signature at the end, 0x55AA, then what we're
seeing should not be happening. It's possible in all but 1 in 65536
cases to definitively identify that there is no partition table on the
disk.
(2) Even in that small chance that the signature is there "randomly" (on
a random filled disk), partition entries would also show up randomly.
They would not show up specifically at 181GB into the disk.
Therefore, something that we shouldn't expect is going on here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1531404
Title:
nonexistent partition in /dev, & lsblk/disk util misbehaving with
randomized disks
Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
I have two 2T disks with no partition table and which have been filled
with random data. GNU parted shows nothing on this disk:
GNU Parted 3.2
Using /dev/sda
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) print
Error: /dev/sda: unrecognised disk label
Model: ATA WDC WD2002FAEX-0 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 2000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:
but when I check with `lsblk`, I see one disk with partitions and the
other without:
Code:
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 1.8T 0 disk
└─sda2 8:2 0 1.6T 0 part
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sdb 8:16 0 1.8T 0 disk
and the Disks utility agrees (see: http://ibin.co/2SQv4KbH06Mz).
Also, /dev/disk/by-id contains an entry pointing to sda and one
pointing to sda2. So it really does think there's a second partition
there.
Thinking there was something wrong, I re-filled the disks with random
data. Now sda is properly (in the Disks utility as just an "unknown
disk"), but sdb shows a second partition, and identically to how sda
was showing it before (ie the Disks utility output is the same with
181GB at the beginning and 128GB at the end).
I am running all this from the Ubuntu Gnome 15.10 installer disk.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1531404/+subscriptions