touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Robert Clark <returntoreptar@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds good, here is the output from: lsblk --pairs "--output=$full" /dev/sda
ALIGNMENT="0" DISC-ALN="0" DISC-GRAN="0B" DISC-MAX="0B" DISC-ZERO="0" FSTYPE="" GROUP="disk" KNAME="sda" LABEL="" LOG-SEC="512" MAJ:MIN="8:0" MIN-IO="512" MODE="brw-rw----" MODEL="main            " MOUNTPOINT="" NAME="sda" OPT-IO="0" OWNER="root" PHY-SEC="512" RM="1" RO="0" ROTA="1" RQ-SIZE="128" SIZE="100G" STATE="running" TYPE="disk" UUID=""
ALIGNMENT="0" DISC-ALN="0" DISC-GRAN="0B" DISC-MAX="0B" DISC-ZERO="0" FSTYPE="" GROUP="disk" KNAME="sda1" LABEL="" LOG-SEC="512" MAJ:MIN="8:1" MIN-IO="512" MODE="brw-rw----" MODEL="" MOUNTPOINT="/" NAME="sda1" OPT-IO="0" OWNER="root" PHY-SEC="512" RM="1" RO="0" ROTA="1" RQ-SIZE="128" SIZE="100G" STATE="" TYPE="part" UUID=""

And the output from lsblk --pairs "--output=$short" /dev/sda
NAME="sda" MAJ:MIN="8:0" RM="1" SIZE="100G" RO="0" TYPE="disk" MOUNTPOINT=""
NAME="sda1" MAJ:MIN="8:1" RM="1" SIZE="100G" RO="0" TYPE="part" MOUNTPOINT="/"

I may be misreading it, however it looks to me like the initial output
is telling the same story, in lsblk -l  it looks to me like it has the
below structure with formatting, which seems to me that it is being
reported wrong all the way around. That being said I don't have any
experience with lsblk so I could be completely off.

NAME   MAJ:MIN   RM  SIZE    RO TYPE  MOUNTPOINT
sda         8:0               1     100G   0     disk
sda1       8:1               1     100G   0     part    /

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532062

Title:
  Drives mistakenly reported as removable

Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I have multiple servers which report their drives are removable, even
  though the drives are the main drives in the device (/dev/sda,
  /dev/sdb, etc). One of such machines (an IBM system x3650 M1) I have
  pulled a report from lsblk and lshw below and included them. These are
  configured using the RAID controller that came with the machine. I can
  provide any other information needed. I am seeing the same on a HP
  proliant DL100 g2. In this case the removable tag is triggering a
  problem with curtin since curtin currently refuses to install to
  drives reported as removable by lsblk.

  output of: lsblk -l
  NAME MAJ:MIN RM   SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
  sda    8:0    1   100G  0 disk 
  sda1   8:1    1   100G  0 part /
  sdb    8:16   1 173.2G  0 disk 
  sdb1   8:17   1 172.2G  0 part /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0
  sdb2   8:18   1  1023M  0 part 
  sr0   11:0    1  1024M  0 rom  

  output of: sudo lshw -class disk
    *-disk:0                
         description: SCSI Disk
         physical id: 0.0.0
         bus info: scsi@2:0.0.0
         logical name: /dev/sda
         size: 99GiB (107GB)
         capabilities: partitioned partitioned:dos
         configuration: sectorsize=512
    *-disk:1
         description: SCSI Disk
         physical id: 0.1.0
         bus info: scsi@2:0.1.0
         logical name: /dev/sdb
         size: 173GiB (186GB)
         capabilities: gpt-1.00 partitioned partitioned:gpt
         configuration: guid=66a282c8-da87-4502-902d-ce5c7b4da275 sectorsize=512
    *-disk:2 UNCLAIMED
         description: SCSI Disk
         physical id: 1.0.0
         bus info: scsi@2:1.0.0
    *-disk:3 UNCLAIMED
         description: SCSI Disk
         physical id: 1.1.0
         bus info: scsi@2:1.1.0
    *-cdrom
         description: DVD reader
         product: UJDA780 DVD/CDRW
         vendor: MATSHITA
         physical id: 0.0.0
         bus info: scsi@1:0.0.0
         logical name: /dev/cdrom
         logical name: /dev/sr0
         version: CA21
         capabilities: removable audio cd-r cd-rw dvd
         configuration: ansiversion=5 status=nodisc

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1532062/+subscriptions