touch-packages team mailing list archive

[Michi Henning <michi.henning@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Track" is preferable. That's because not all audio that ends up in
user's collection is a song. It may be university lectures, voice memos,
audio books, etc.

iTunes is inconsistent there too. It uses "Songs" as a column heading,
but "Track #" for numbering, and "Items" when I look at the summary for
a music (yes, music only) collection. They are doing worse than we are!
:-)

Anyway, my vote goes to "Track".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity-scope-mediascanner
in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1378143

Title:
  [Music App and Scope] Consistent use of "Songs" or "Tracks" between
  Music app and Music scope

Status in Ubuntu Music App:
  Triaged
Status in Ubuntu UX:
  In Progress
Status in unity-scope-mediascanner package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  It'd be ideal if both the Music app (which currently uses "Songs") and
  the Music scope (which uses "Tracks") used similar terminology.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1378143/+subscriptions